My Ford Dreams Classic

Just a reminder, MyFordDreams moved to MyFordDreams2

2009-05-21T01:58:00.005-04:00

Just a reminder to old readers and a re-direct for those who stumbled upon MyFordDreams, if you've enjoyed what I've done here, go to the link in title to read my further adventures dreaming about all things Ford. http://www.myforddreams2.blogspot.com/ is where I'm blogging now.

This site is basically an archive of the first few years.

Ford Ranger, what should the future hold? Will Ford keep it alive in the US?

2009-05-10T10:42:00.004-04:00

Today there was a comment on one of my archived posts that brought back one of my favorite gripes. The Ranger, how Ford has let it lapse and what I hope they will do. Ok, let's get some history here, the Ranger name started as a trim level on the full size Ford F-Series trucks, just like the Eplorer badge. Starting in the late 60's and early 70's Japanese makes started to bring compact pickups to the US, Nissan and Toyota leading the way, but Isuszu and Mazda also. So, when the Domestic makes saw an emerging market segment, they initially imported partner trucks rebadged as their own, in the case of Ford that was the Courier. But eventually they recognized that a true Domestic compact pickup would make more sense and the Ranger was born . And from 1987 to 2004 it was segment leader. In many ways it was far superior to the Courier it replaced and Ford improved it with each generation. But the evolution stopped in 2000 or so and it was just mild refresh after that, until this day. I believe it was a combination of relatively cheap fuel here in the states and our tendancy to super size everything. While competitors grew in size, the Ranger remained compact. It remains a profitable unit for the company, especially since they've done no real development over the last decade. What a shame really. But with new safety and emissions standards coming into effect soon, the current Ranger is coming to a point where Ford can't sell it, even if customers were lined up out the door, which really they aren't. One major fault is that the current Ranger can't be fitted with airbags in the A pillar. Another minor fault is that it's not available in a true 4 door cab here, while it has been all over the world, including Mexico.

But as with Ford's need for small fuel efficient car, they have the answer in their global garage.

Ford developed a new Ranger (Mazda BT-50 also ) for markets outside of the United States.

And I've posted about it before, because it's a class leader and would be a huge hit here.

I'm not sure if it has air bags in the A pillar, but I'd guess it does since it's sold in Europe.

It's also got 2 great Diesel powertrain options and one of the nicest interiors I've ever seen in a compact truck. So, should Ford rush to get this cleared to come here? Would they import it from Asia or build it here? Yes they should rush to bring it market! If the Diesels aren't going to meet emisions, they can stick the 2.5 petrol I-4 and 3.5 V-6 in there. Over the last few years I've read criticism of the Ranger on the web and speculation that Ford should introduce a new Mid Size pickup using the F-100 nameplate. I disagree, but if they did it right, I'd be willing to take a look.

Now, this is a photoshop done quite a while ago by "FUD" (?) that I had seen on several message boards suggesting that the new Ranger be based on an Explorer chassis. But at this point is that prudent? Haven't we had that already? Isn't that the crap known as the Sport Trac?

What say you? I say, bring us the Global Ranger, with the Diesel option for those pulling boat trailers.

MyFordDreams moved to MyFordDreams2

2008-02-19T10:10:00.001-05:00

For those that get here via a web search like Google or Yahoo, this blog has moved to the link in the title. MyFordDreams is continued at http://myforddreams2.blogspot.com/

I haven't been very active, but things will pick up soon.

KMRL Blogothon 2007

2007-07-25T09:11:00.000-04:00

I'm blowing the dust off my keyboard here to spread the word about KMRL MojoRadioLive and their efforts to raise money for wounded vets. KMRL is taking part in Blogothon 2007.
Click the link in title to sponsor them and tune in at their website http://www.mojoradiolive.com/ to listen to the 24 hours of live shows .

I hear there's going to be contests and prizes, but more importantly you'll be helping wounded heroes!

A tragedy in a small town, ten years later, the case of Charles Campbell and Richard D DiGuglielmo

2006-10-03T09:25:00.000-04:00

Sorry folks, way off topic today, but that's the way the cookie crumbles. 10 years ago today a terrible tragedy happened in a small suburban town. Lives of many people both inocent and not were changed forever. And for what? A parking space! And 10 years later, the man who ended another's life, says that he'd do it again if he had to and his supporters act as if he is a victim. I have no personal bone to pick with these people, no vendeta. I don't have a grudge against Police Officers or Italian Americans, nor with the town of Dobbs Ferry New York. But I've read quite a lot of unbalanced opinion in the forums of my local paper concerning this story. I've seen webpages devoted to the "railroading" of this unintentional killer and feel a need to speak out.
Richard D. DiGuglielmo was 31 years old and had aproximately 10 years on the New York Police Department, but was off duty on the 3rd of October 1996 at 5pm when the events that shatterd lives occurred.

Charles Campbell was 37 years old and a father of one son. I have to admit I didn't know him, and unfortunately couldn't find much information on him online. But how much can you find online about an average citizen. I'm sure he was no angel, how many of us are? Maybe he had a few encounters with the law, but many people do, especially young black men. But Charles Campbell's only "crime" that day, was that he stopped on Ashford Avenue for a slice of Pizza and parked in the nearest parking lot to the little shop. Unfortunately he couldn't have known how fatal that mistake would be. You see, the Pizza shop doesn't have any parking and the street that it's on is a busy road with no on-street parking in front of it. So Mr Campbell like many before him, parked in the lot for the Venice Deli, owned by Richard B DiGuglielmo who was 54 on this date.

The Venice Deli was the busiest business in a tiny commercial property that included a nail salon upstairs and a florist on the next lot. The owner was fiercly protective of the few spots in the small lot, and his frustration must have been very great that day. I'm sure that Mr DiGuglielmo the senior's blood would boil everytime he saw another car park in "his" lot and run across the street to the Pizza Parlor on the corner. So when Charles Campbell pulled up in his 1993 Corvette, jumped out and started across the street, the elder DiGuglielmo yelled after him. Campbell is reported to have called back to the shop owner, that he would come back and purchase a soda from his deli after he got his slice of Pizza.

Frustration and anger forced the Deli owner to go inside and grab a "No Parking" sticker, then return to the Corvette plastering it to the driver's window. Now it was Mr Campbell's turn for anger.

There are rarely inocent parties in this type of confrontations, and only the people who were there can know exactly what happened, but the reports say that Campbell and the elder DiGuglielmo started with heated words, then pushing and shoving. At some point The son and son in-law both men in their 30's emerged from the Deli and Campbell probably fearing being out numbered went to his trunk to get an aluminum baseball bat. Like I said there are rarely inocents involved in this type of tragedy. So one man against three armed with a baseball bat. At that point, you would have thought someone would have called the Police.

Dobbs Ferry, a town I lived in for a few years, is not a big town, from the Deli to the Police station is maybe a mile and a half, and the hospital and fire station are only half a mile from where this happened. I can't tell you how many times I've seen Police cars parked in the Deli's lot. It couldn't have taken more than a few minutes if someone had called for officers to arrive. But no, instead Richard the younger went back into the Deli and retrieved a 32 caliber pistol from behind the counter. His father's gun from what I've read in the paper. A curious detail that probably means nothing, but why would an off duty Police officer need to go for a gun? I have friends and family on different Police forces and they ussually have an off duty gun on their person.

You can see where this is going I'm sure, the son came out and shot the "bat weilding fellon" as his family and supporters have portrayed him, three times in the torso. He was defending his father, a noble thing. Something I can appreciate, if I could have saved my father's life the same way, I'm sure I would have. But that's purely an emotional response on my part, and probably of many suporters.

Many of the people who left comments on the local paper's forums sound like Police supporters, and I don't take issue with that. But how many know the ground where this happened? How many can take a step back and see how many ways this could have been avoided. Why is Charles Campbell's past examined in any way? The man stopped for a slice of Pizza! He wasn't holding up the Deli! He parked where an angry shopkeeper didnt' want him to!!!!

I knew Richard D DiGulielmo in High School, not as a friend, but in passing. He seemd like a very nice guy, just your average high school kid. Not a jerk or a bully at all. I did not know him on October 3 1996, nor can I put myself in his place. I'm sure he felt justified in killing a man that was swinging a baseball bat at his father.

But all this over a parking spot!

Many lives were changed that day a decade ago, one was ended. A son, a boy of 12 never saw his father again, Charles Campbell's son. A father watched his son taken away to prison, Rich DiGuglielmo's father. The pain for these families won't go away, the events of that fatefull day will haunt them all for the rest of their lives. And well it should.

DiGuglielmo's family and supporters claim an overzealous District Attorney played the race card and his punishment was too severe. I'm not a lawyer, I don't know, but 20 years to life sounds about right for killing a man. Despite emotions, this was not self defense, and nobody involved was a total inocent. Charles Campbell feared for his safety when he got the bat from the trunk.

The sad truth may be this, one man is dead and another's future is ruined, because on petty man wanted to lay claim to a piece of asphalt.

I feel sorry for Charle's Campbell's family and even for Richard DiGuglielmo's family. It's hard not to feel that all this could have, should have been avoided.

Continuing rants and raves over at MyFordDreams2!

2006-07-25T06:11:00.001-04:00

Did you come here looking for my latest ramblings on FoMoCo and are now disapointed to see no activity? Don't worry MyFordDreams continues on a new blog! http://myforddreams2.blogspot.com

Some of my latest posts have been about Mustang GT, Ranger and what FoMoCo can and should do to turn it around.

Click on the link in title to read about the Ranger/F100 question.
The picture above is a photoshop of what a new Ranger based on the Explorer would look like and it's well done.

MyFordDreams moving, but still on Blogger

2006-03-25T14:55:00.000-05:00

OK, so if you read my blog, you will know that I've been having technical problems this week. And I've been reading others people's blogs and comments, as well as receiving e-mails from fellow bloggers, letting me know that it wasn't just me. Apparently Blogger was having problems with servers or something?? But I had considered moving MyFordDreams to another service or ending it alltogether. Gary The Garage Guy even offered to host my blog on his server, Thank you Gary.

But I've decided to stay with Blogger, and have decided to continue MyFordDreams in a new blog MyFordDreams2. But not satisfied with that alone, I've gone a little nuts, and created some campanion blogs for MyFordDreams2, there will now be Non-FordDreams where I talk about ineresting Non-Ford vehicles and AlternativeFuelUniverse where I will discuss things like BioDiesel, E85, Ethanol, Hydrogen and Hybrids, simply from an enthusisasts point of view. So now I will have 3 blogs of my own and hopefully still contribute to The Blog for Auto Bloggers also .

Now I've moved all of my links from the sidebar to the new blogs, so actually anyone who had one link from my blog, now has 3 links. I would hope anyone who reads my blog will bookmark my new page http://myforddreams2.blogspot.com and if you subscribe to an RSS feed, make that update as well. Now I'm not saying that you need to bookmark all 3, my main focus will continue to be Ford, but I want to try and spread my wings a little and by having 3 blogs, not fill up one too fast.

I have no intention of deleting any part of MyFordDreams original site, hopefully it will remain as long as Blogger will allow. I may have to post something from time to time to keep it active, I don't know. So I hipe I'm not inconveniencing anyone too much or taking on more than I can chew. I've spent the better part of the day working on all 3 new blogs, transferring links and such, and anticipate starting up again Monday full force on MyFordDreams2

Wish me luck,
Joe

New GT350H at AutoBlog?

2006-03-24T11:06:00.001-05:00

Now I've seen this one on several websites, but Edmunds Inside Line claims the exclusive, and I'll give the hat top to AutoBlog, because that's where I saw it first. It looks like Ford is going to introduce a 2006 Mustang GT350H at the New York Auto Show in April. I'm planning on going, so I'll try and get a decent digital photo. The original GT350H was a specially prepared Shelby GT350 Mustang in special black and gold livery sold to Hertz and rented through a special program. So in this year the 40th aniversary of that special model it sort of makes sense to pay tribute.

Now I had mentioned a while back that this 06 Pony Package V6 Mustang bears a striking resemblance to the 66 GT350H. It's got the stripes and that retro styling, including the fog lights on the grill bar. Now the new GT350H won't have the GT500's supercharged 450 hp engine, but will instead be a slightly modified Mustang GT with an extra 20 hp. Still a fitting tribute. Edmunds says there will be 200 available for rental at select Hertz outlets.

Test post

2006-03-23T21:40:00.000-05:00

I had intended to post about the Mustang GT350H that was discussed at AutoBlog and the Panoz Esperante before I started to experience problems here.
Now it looks like it may have only been a temporary situation, so I'll see how things look on Friday. Brian of Racedriven.com and Ben of Ben'sOzCarBlog have given me some advice over at AutoBloggers, but I still don't know what the fate of this blog will be. My contingency plan is to continue MyFordDreams on a new blog linked above, and also hosted on Blogger. I may just have reached some limits on photo storage or post limits. I have over 1100 posts and at least as many photos on here, and so many links that it maybe what's causing publishing problems.

So this is a test to see how the situation is shaping up.

Could this be the end of MyFordDreams?

2006-03-23T13:52:00.000-05:00

I've been having major problems with Blogger this week. It's taking forever to get anything posted, no matter how simple. And loading pictures is hit or miss at best. I don't think it's my computer, because I use more than one to post. I've tried testing the situation, by creating and posting to 2 new blogs; www.alternativefueluniverse.blogspot.com and www.myforddreams2.blogspot.com

Maybe I've just used up my storage limit on this blog? I don't know, but I'm going to shut down for a couple of days until I can figure out what to do.

Technical problems keep blogging slow

2006-03-23T12:35:00.000-05:00

I've been having problems with Blogger the last few days. I know it's not my computers, it's got something to with Blogger itself. So I may have to move over to a new blog, for now on Blogger. Starting Friday, I'm going to try posting on 2 pages.

Petition for C1 Focus

2006-03-23T12:08:00.001-05:00

A frequent commentor ThatDudeMike, sent me the link above for an online petition urging FoMoCo to bring the C1 "Euro" Focus to the US market.

Hybrid/Alternative fuel talk again, I'm going to sound like a broken record here

2006-03-23T11:41:00.001-05:00

I had an earlier post about the fact that Ford was putting incentives on the hood of Escape Hybrids, and that I thought this was unussual. Two readers commented on this situation, Shawn, who believes that people who buy Hybrids, are not your typical domestic car buyer, and Igor who points out that Ford is not the only manufacturer that is seeing a slowdown in Hybrid SUV sales. So I thought on their comments and the subject in general, and this is my take on it.

Shawn may have a point that many people that would buy Hybrids would not oridnarilly be domestic vehicle customers, but that doesn't mean that there isn't a place in the market for Hybrids. The idea is that people that wouldnt' normally buy Hybrids wil buy them. As gas prices go up and down ( and never down enough) people that wouldn't normally be drawn in by new trends, may want a Hybrid, thinking of the savings in fuel costs. So while Hollywood types and the cultural elite, may not be snapping up Ford Escape Hybrids, maybe some average Joe or Jane would. Escecially if they need a slightly larger vehicle than a Prius.

But Igor points to the fact that Toyota Highlander, Lexus and Honda Accord Hybrids are slowing down in sales. Now when I say they're slowing down, that doesn't mean they're not selling, just that the waiting lists are gone. This was innevitable, as gas prices normalized after the recovery from Hurricane Katrina. But the end of waiting lists is being overhyped by journalists and pundits. Hybrids will have a part of the market in the future, maybe not a huge part, but they're not going away. Especially in fleet sales in the future. The Hybrids that are still selling like hotcakes are the Toyota Prius and Honda Civic, because of their lower prices relative to the others and of course their higher fuel economy.

Ford has new Hybrid models in the pipeline, expect a Fusion/Milan and possibly an Edge version and later the 500/Freestyle. Ford hopes to sell up to 250,000 Hybrid units a year when they're fully up to speed. Spread over the different models this should lower the premium paid for a Hybrid slightly, and offer flexability to customers. But Ford should also consider Hybrid versions of their Focus and Fiesta models when they are replace/introduced in the US market. The trend for Hybrids is toward smaller vehicles. There are several common sense reasons for this. First the increase in economy is higher in smaller models, and since Hybrids are better suited to an Urban style of driving it makes sense that smaller models are easier to park in the city. So Hybrid versions of vehicles like the Focus and Fiesta, and possibly and EcoSport would be better for these markets.

Hybrid versions of 500/Freestyle and Fusion/Milan would be better suited to fleet sales, such as taxis, police cars and municipal services. Ford will have the systems ready by 2008 (?) for many of these models and it's a smart move.

But I've said before, Hybrids aren't for everyone, there has to be more options. The higher price of purchase and maintenance of a Hybrid will keep some people away. Ford and others need to suppliment their Hybrid efforts with Diesel and E85 models. Diesels are also slightly more expensive to buy than gas version of the same model, but maintenance is not more expensive, and they are known for lasting longer ( the powertrains anyway.) Add the Bio Fuel situation into the mix and Diesels can make better sense for people that do longer highway commutes and non urban driving. Ford has a small advantage in their Hybrid Escape, since they've been testing E85/Hybrids taking advantage of both technologies. Ford needs to increase the mix of E85 models too.

No single technologie will be enough to eliminate our dependance on foreign oil or help clean the air we breath. What we need is a mix of alternative fuel technology, Hybrids and smaller more efficient vehicles. Remember the Reflex concept that I love so much? It's got a Hybrid/Diesel powertrain with energy reclaimed for braking and solar panels in the roof, so it can achieve fule economy of 65 mpg. Not bad huh? And if the Diesel it's using is Bio Diesel, what little fuel it burns is cleaner than we could have dreamed of a decade ago.

Ford's "Driving American Innovation" campain, is more than words, they're working with all of these technologies and more. Ford has been working with Hydraulic Launch Assist and Hydrogen Internal Combustion Engines, as well as Direct Gasoline Injection (Mazda) so they are covering all the bases and if they can survive these tough times, can be in a position to respond to consumer's preferences. A good mix of these technologies is what I hope to see from Ford over the next few years.

Honda Fit is coming in late April, when and how should Ford answer?

2006-03-22T11:04:00.001-05:00

Recently there's been a lot of talk of the upcoming Honda Fit, the new B-Segment model positioned below the Civic. I've read about it recently on Jalopnik, AutoBlog and Edmunds including pricing and driving impressions. Honda sees the Civic as moving slightly up in size and price, and saw the need to have a new entry level model positioned to compete with new Korean and Chinese models. Nissan has the new Versa coming, and much has been made of GM's imported Chevy Aveo. I don't know how big this new market segment is going to be, but I do know that Ford needs to be there too.
It's been reported that Ford intends to bring a new B-Segment model based on the Fiesta/Mazda2. Now look closely at this Fiesta and the Fit above, they're very close in size and style. Ford has it's B-Segment model in their overseas lineup. The Fiesta comes in 3 and 5 door models, with 2 petrol and 2 diesel engines.
There's even an ST version with 150 hp! Now just to remind you, ST is Ford of Europe's version of SVT. 150 hp may not sound like a lot, but consider this models lower weight and price. This is comparable to a Fit Sport, which Honda is rumored to be bringing in later this year or next. There is even a mini MPV or SUV version called the EcoSport/Fusion and a pickup version the Bantam/Courier.
So what ever it takes, Ford needs to answer Honda's challenge and have product for the US market as quickly as possible. Wouldn't you want a sporty hatch that gets 40 mpg for under $20K ? Fiesta mechanicals can underpin niche models like the Bronco and Reflex also. Rumors had been that Ford is going to build a new plant in Mexico to produce Fiesta based vehicles. Smart money would make it a flexible production facility, with the ability to build 3 and 5 door Fiestas, EcoSports, Broncos and the new Reflex. Even if Ford only sells 30-40,000 of each model, the shared platform and production facility will share costs. Make all versions E85 ready from the start, and bring at least one of the Diesel powerplants. A Hybrid in the future couldn't hurt, but may not be necessary considering the economy of both petrol and diesel models.

When I was in Ireland a few years ago, I was able to see the Fiesta and Fusion up close, and they're nice little cars, I've already said I would be first in line to buy the Reflex if it is built. Now is the time to "drive American Innovation" not sit back and watch from the sidelines.

Wood chips and corn stalks? and more Ethanol from AutoBlog

2006-03-21T19:09:00.001-05:00

Seems to be a lot of alternative fuel talk over at AutoBlog today. First is the article linked in the title, about Bio Mass fuels and then this article later in the afternoon about Ethanol . And you all should know by now, that I'm a big believer in Bio Diesel and Ethanol. These two fuels have so much potential on very different fronts. From health benefits and evironmental friendliness to economic boosts and national security improvements. But as many point out on different forums, the petrolium industry isn't jumping at the prospects of non petrolium fuels. MBTE, and adative used in gasoline is being phased out, because of health issues, and is expected to be replaced in gasoline, in levels less than or equal to 10%, so it can be used in any gasoline powered vehicle, not just E85 prepped ones.

I've said it before, legislation may be needed to give industry the incentive or push to create the infrastructure to create and distribute these bio fuels. I pointed out in a post last week, that the largest effort at bio fuel produciton seems to be a French owned Agri-Business in the midwest. We need more domestic investment and involvement for this fledgling industry, or we will be replacing dependance on foreign oil with dependance on foreign Ethanol.

I don't care if you use wood chips, corn, grass clippings or algae, hell use a combination of all of them if need be, but this is an exciting time in our history and I'd hate to see it pass. With all the groups that seem to be supportive of bio fuels including the American Lung Association of the Midwest, General Motors, Ford Motor Company, polaticians, celebrities like Willie Nelson and our President and don't let me forget the environmentalists, who we all used to laugh at, but now don't laugh as hard. There are just too many good points and not enough detractors for this not to go through. To be honest, I'd rather pay $3.50 a gallon for some domestically produced fuel than $2.65 for Gasoline.

NY City politicos call for Hybrid Crown VIc Taxis

2006-03-21T14:26:00.000-05:00

I was reading in the New York Post, a paragraph saying Two Brooklyn Democrats were "urging" Ford to make a Hybrid version of the Crown Victoria. It amazes me that these two think Ford can just whip up a Hybrid, because they ask nicely. Now that doesn't mean I don't think Hybrid taxis couldn't work, far from it, but let's put a little thought into it.

I had posted several months ago about testing of Escape Hybrid taxis in several cities. Now for New York Escapes are too small for taxi service. But as I said then, the new 500 is sufficient in size for the job. And Ford is closer to a production Hybrid on the 500/FreeStyle. The Escape represents the 1st generation Hybrid fromFord, next will be Fusion/Milan Hybrids and later 500/Montego/FreeStyle versions. So New York taxi fleets should start evaluating the 500/FreeStyle for fleet use. Their all wheel drive and spacious itneriors would be an advantage. The chances of Ford creating a gas/electric hybrid of the Crown Victoria is like a snowball in hell, not going to happen. Hell, Ford is getting ready to phase out the large rear wheel drive platform, and shoot itself in the foot doing so.

I can't wait to figure out why I'm not able to post pictures to blogger, I've tried on 2 different computers, so I don't think it's me.

Next Freelander to be based on C1 platform, that's Focus of Europe

2006-03-20T11:16:00.000-05:00

Now, you may notice that I haven't posted pictures with the latest pieces, I'm having technical difficulties so bear with me. But I hope that people stop by more for my rants than the pictures. So here we go.

Over at AutoBlog, there is a piece about the new Land Rover Freelander, saying it's going to be based on the new C1 platform and styled similar to the LR3 (Discovery.) Neither is a huge surprise, it's been mentioned on this blog and many others before. The C1 platform if you didn't know is the European Ford Focus (Mazda3 Mazda5 Volvo S40/V50/C70 Ford C-Max/S-Max) and maybe some day, come here to the US as a Ford. But the Freelander, may have company on this new all wheel drive variation of the C1, the XC50 from Volvo and the next generation Jaguar X-Type. Rumors on the X-Type say it will be an Estate/Shooting Brake, that's station wagon to us Americans. Some purists will argue about the Freelander being based on such lowly a chassis as a Ford, but to hell with them. Land Rover needs a fresh start with the little SUV, and will of course tune the C1 chassis and powerplants enough to distinguish itself from it's lesser siblings.

So I say again, why don't we in the US get a Ford on the C1 platform? It's available here as a Mazda and Volvo, and obviously soon as Jaguar and Land Rover, so it's good enough. But again the argument about costs comes up. And again I say Bull, it's getting to the point, that Ford can't afford not to bring this new Focus to the US. Not that the US version of the Focus is actually a bad car, it's just the knowledge that a better Focus is available everywhere else, really grinds my teeth.

What say you? Should Ford bring the C1 Focus to the US? What do you think about the C1 based Freelander? Is it diluting a brand?

Fusion vs Sonata, I drive both back to back in the real world

2006-03-20T10:30:00.001-05:00

Over the weekend, I had the opportunity to drive both the Ford Fusion and Hyundai Sonata on the same day and same roads. I had driven the Fusion a couple of times, but it was my first drive of the new Sonata. So having fair weather and time to burn I headed over to the local Hyundai dealer first.

The Sonata is a decent car, it feels solid, nothing like the first Hyundais I drove 16 years ago. It's styling is very nice, more Honda than the Accord actually. And standard equipment and warranty make it a good value. But how is it to drive? That's what I had been wondering for several months. I had read comparisons with the Fusion and Sonata (among others) and other reviews. Now on paper the Sonata compares favorably to the Fusion and others, but despite the warranty and standard airbags, it's still not quite as good as the Fusion. I know, you're thinking I'm biased, after all the name of my blog is MyFordDreams, but I went into this with no preconceived notions. I walked into each dealer as if I was shopping for a new car. The interior and trunk space seems slightly better in the Hyundai, but the interior materials were slightly better on the Ford. Styling would go to Hyundai also, I like the looks more than the Fusion.

But where the Ford really showed it's superiority, was on the road. Both cars were 4cyl auto base models. I took each on local streets and then onto the Sprain Brook Parkway, where I didn't drive like a nut, but wanted to see how each accelerated, shifted, handled the road and braked. The Fusion obviously benefited from it's Mazda DNA, as it's road grip was very good for a 4 door family sedan, it stayed planted and steering effort and feel was very good. The Sonata on the other hand felt like a 20 year old Buick sedan, it's steering was vague and sloppy, it wallowed over the same roads feeling floaty like only a 1986 Buick Century could. Acceleration was good on both, as were shift from the slush boxes, I honestly couldn't give the nod to either here. Each car merged onto the fast moving parkway with ease and cruised up to 70 mph with no strain or sense of buzziness. Where the Fusion really out did the Sonata was again road holding, ride and braking. The Sonata's brakes felt mushy, not the safest feeling at all.

Pricing was very close, with the Ford's sticker price actually a few hundred dollars less for similar equipment. But for my money the Fusion was the hands down winner. Not that a Sonata wouldn't make someone a happy motorist, just not anyone who's ever driven a better car. So if you wanted to know what to trade your 86 Century in on, now you know. You'll feel right at home. There's room for improvement with the Fusion, to be fair, but it's the better driver's car.

Will GM beat Ford to the punch with Diesels for US?

2006-03-20T10:11:00.001-05:00

I read this article over the weekend at AutoBlog, saying that GM could be bringing Diesels from their European models here to the US. A 3.0 liter V6 and a 4.7 liter V8. Now the V6 makes sense, and I expected Saab to have one, but the 4.7 V8? Why no I4 Diesels? But we'll have to see what GM has in mind. But it was innevitable that one of the "Domestic" automakers would tap their Euro assets for Diesels.

Ford has a comprehensive range of I4 and V6 Deiels that could be brought to the US. From the Fiesta 1.4 DuraTorq to the new 3.0 V6 from the new Ranger, there are several choices that could easilly be planted in new and existing models from the blue oval.

But will Chrysler beat both to the punch? They already have the 2.8l I4 Common Rail Diesel in the Jeep Liberty, and of course the I5 Turbo Diesels in their Sprinter vans. But could we see Parent Mercedes lend Chrysler their BlueTec powerplants for the E based 300/Magnum/Charger? What about Mitsubishi Diesels? Chrysler no longer owns much of a stake in Mitsu, but shared platforms could mean shared powerplants.

So who shoots first? Who has the foresight and guts to bring a Diesel back into a "Domestic" vehicle? Obviuosly Jeep division of Chrysler is there and rumors of CDI Calibers have been spotted by people like the AutoProphet.

click the link and read AutoBlog's article on GM's efforts.

Whatt the Heck? Ford needs to put incentives on Escape Hybrids ?

2006-03-18T19:35:00.000-05:00

Now this makes no sense to me and looks like a black eye for Ford. It seems that in select markets Ford is offering incentives of $1,000 on Escape Hybrids. How can this be? The 2 markets are California and Washington DC. Ford has the Escape and Mariner twins as Hybrids, but if they really want to make a substantial impact, they need to roll out their Fusion/Milan versions ASAP!

National BioDiesel Day? AutoBlog has the scoop

2006-03-18T17:26:00.001-05:00

Maybe in a few years it can be changed to National Fuel Independance Day, but for now it's National BioDiesel Day! Very interesting article and link to the site anouncing and explaing the event at AutoBlog. Above is a map of Arab Oil Fields, the main source for our national dependance. The "Crack Dealers" in Sheets, that cry for our deaths as they count our dollars.
It's important that we take these issues seriously. It's easy to laugh off "National BioDiesel Day" as some "Greenie" non-event, but that would be to our shame. I see Bio Fuels, especially Bio Diesel as one of the most important changes this country NEEDS to make. It just makes too much sense.

Yes BioDiesel is difficult to buy at this time, and depending on where you buy it, may cost slightly more, but it burns much cleaner than Petro Diesel and requires no modification to run in any Diesel Powered Vehicle. Diesel, the man originally designed his engines to run on Peanut Oil, and despite the development and evolution of Diesel powerplants over the last century, you can take any Diesel vehicle and run them on BioDiesel, with no modifications. And you'd be improving the Environment, Health of your neighbor, Economy and National Security with no more effort than filling your tank. And BioDiesel would work so well in some of those great European Ford models that we don't get!

I'll take the Mondeo Estate with the 2.0TDCI and 6 speed manual!

MyFordDreams off for the weekend, Happy St Pat's

2006-03-16T11:35:00.000-05:00

I'm going to be taking a break for a few days, don't expect to be posting. It's Saint Patricks Day Friday, and me being of Irish descent, I'm going to be going to the Parade in New York City and seeing family. You won't find me in some dark pub drinking green beer, that's not every Irishman. I won't be in church either, even though it is a feast day.

But I will be celebrating my Celtic heritage proudly and hopefully be surounded by Family and Friends. My oldest brother is a Fireman and will be marching. We're all very proud of him, and his involvment in several Irish American organizations like the AOH and Emerald Society. One of my brother in-laws is a Police Officer and will be playing the bagpipes for the first time in the New York parade, so we're all looking forward to that. Unfortunately my mother will not be in the city Friday, because the crowds and standing are too much, so hopefully my siblings and I will take a few pictures.

I'm Irish American on both sides, my Father's Grandfather being born in Ireland and both of my Mother's Parents being born in Ireland. My mother actually lived there for a short period, before her family returned to the US. And here's a stretch, but just so I can say that this post is Ford related, my Mother's Father worked in a Ford plant in New Jersey for a period of time.

Have a safe and happy holiday if you celebrate, and remember what it's really about, not beer and stupid hats, but family.

Jalopnik has the story on the coolest Rally school, but I don't think I'd fit in one of those little cars

2006-03-16T11:13:00.000-05:00

Now tell me that this doesn't look like fun. I was reading Jalopnik, like I do everyday, and saw a story about Ford running a Rally Driving school, for kids as young as 10! Now we in the US have many driving schools, but this just struck me as very cool.

Last year the love of my life, offered to send me to a race driving school, but money was too tight, so I passed. I'd love to do something like this, but I'm not sure I'd fit in one of those little cars. Some day I guess

Jeremy Clarkson is not happy with his photo printer or the new Volvo C70

2006-03-16T10:55:00.000-05:00

Jeremy Clarkson drives the new Volvo C70 (Focus Cabrio) and is disappointed. Not that you would know if you read the first page of his review, which deals with his odessy through the world of Photo Printers. He praises the styling and the stereo, but says the steering is awful, and he was afraid to really dig into the 220 hp.

I'm interested in what other reviews will say about the C70. Clarkson is not a review I would read if I was shopping for a car, but he is very entertaining. And he's one of the reasons we in the US love Top Gear. Word online is that the Discovery Channel is bringing an American cast to recreate Top Gear in an American version. But without that thoroughly British attitude, I'm not sure it will succeed. Clarkson is one of those people who can say anything and not many get offended. Well maybe they get offended, but who cares, he's entertaining.

Mazda 2 to be less ugly, facelift for Europe

2006-03-16T09:01:00.001-05:00

These pictures are small, I'll try and post some larger ones when they are available. But the news is that the Mazda2, which shares a platform and powertrains with the Euro Ford Fiesta is getting a facelift.
You can see a familial look with the grill and tail lights. Looks like a Mazda3 that was left in the dryer too long.
A little improvement over the last 2, but still not as nice as the Fiesta.
This is the latest update on the Fiesta, and possibly the basis for a new US B-Segment model

Ford Reflex, needed my fix

2006-03-15T11:47:00.001-05:00

I just didn't think I had enough pictures or links on my new favorite, the Ford Reflex so I did a Google search and came up with the following; Serious Wheels and Hybridcars.com andAutobytel and even Wikipedia . I wonder can you overdose on Reflex? No, so that's why I want to point out the following also, FordMuscle.com and TuningNews

I think the Reflex is the best new concept I've seen this year and could be a real exciting product that could draw new buyers to Ford. Think about it, there are "Green" websites and "MuscleCar" websites talking about the concept. It's an easy car to bring to market also. Base it on the new B-Segment platform for the US ( Fiesta/Mazda2) and build it in the same plant as the Bronco/EcoSport down in Mexico. I'd like to see a gas and diesel version and if it could be built and priced reasonably I wouldn't mind the Hybrid version. I'm not too hot on the solar panels in the roof or the "butterfly" doors, but neither would keep me from buyint one.

You may notice fewer posts over coming days, as I've been very busy with other matters. It's another case of "Life getting in the way of blogging," I'm not a journalist, this is just a hobby.

Lincoln/Mercury bizare internet sites

2006-03-14T12:58:00.000-05:00

I was reading Jalopnik last night and they had a post to two sites that Lincoln and Mercury divisions of Ford have featuring bizare short films. It requires you to have a Flash player, but it's a free download if you need it. I would also say that like many videos, it requires a broadband connection.

I want to write it off as stupid, but it was amusing. I just don't see how it helps to sell cars. The first one is The Neverything (link in title) and the second is www.lovelybysurprise.com

Check it ou, then let me know if you think it will help sell cars.

Reader asks, "Can I convert my Ford to run on E85?"

2006-03-14T09:50:00.001-05:00

I received an interesting email from a couple that have a Bronco II and wanted to know what they need to do in order to run it on E85. Now just for the record, I'm not an automotive mechanic or engineer, I don't even do my own maintenance on my truck. But this raised some interest on my part. Their Bronco II is an 88 with the 2.9L V6. So I did an internet search and found the article linked above. It says that at one point it was looking like Conversion kits would be marketed, but Federal rules were too much of a roadblock. But I'm not sure this would apply to do it yourself types.

Now, this is just a guess on my part, but in the case of the Bronco II, there may be an answer using Factory Ford parts. The Bronco II is based on Ranger mechanicals, and Ford did indeed offer Flex Fuel Rangers, capable to run on E85. So many of the Flex Fuel parts should be available in Salvage yards or even from your Ford dealer. In 1999 when I bought my Ranger, there was an option for a 3.0L V6 Flex Fuel, so the computer, fuel tank and lines should be a bolt over swap. It may be advisable to swap the engine and transmission as well.

I'll try and follow up on this subject over coming days.

AutoBlog post about Ford opening photo archives

2006-03-13T19:11:00.000-05:00

I got my hopes up when I saw this post on AutoBlog. Ford is offering photos from their corporate archives. Much like the New York Times offers prints for sale.

But unless you want Mustangs and GT40s, you're out of luck. Don't get me wrong of course I love both Mustangs and GT40s, but would love to see more Ford products and especially some of the concepts from the past.

Ford Ranger Sever Off Road Vehicle package for the world, but not US

2006-03-13T09:56:00.001-05:00

I had seen comments from several readers about a Ranger SORV or Severe Off Road Vehicle model and assumed that they meant the new Ranger that was introduced in Thailand recently. I then came across this article about the SORV Ranger in Indoniesia. It seems to be just a package on the current Ranger. I remember seeing a similar option on the UK Ranger a few months ago. It's a neat package, better shocks and some skid plates, as well as a new intake snorkelt and prefilter. In the US, you can bye these pieces from aftermarket companies, and I wouldn't expect to see any manufacturer to release a factory package like this any time soon. There's one simple reason, the American propensity for litigation.

Think about it, some idiot buys a truck from the factory with a snorkel, drives into a situation beyond his ability as a driver and a lawsuit is the result. It's a neat idea though, and if a Diesel Crew Cab Ranger were availalbe here in the US, I would consider some of these upgrades for myself.

Video of Kabura at UK site WhatCar, need broadband for best viewing

2006-03-13T09:48:00.000-05:00

I found this article through Google, it's a UK website that has a video post of the Kabura concept on the road. Interesting point, if I heard it correctly, they said the price in the UK was going to be near 40,000 Pounds, that's over $80,000 US. I'm hoping I heard that wrong.
With talk of the Kabura possibly coming to production, I only hope Ford can some how bring the Reflex to market. I like both of them, but really love the Reflex. I'd like the Reflex to come to market in the low to mid $20k range.

I don't know how much the Brits pay for an RX8, but can't imagine that $80,000 would be reasonable for the Kabura. Can anyone from the UK tell me what they think?

Mazdaspeed 6 vs Subaru Legacy GT Spec B at Edmunds.com

2006-03-13T09:47:00.000-05:00

My brother has one of these Mazdaspeed6 and it's an amazing car. And I'm posting this for him mostly. It makes sense to do a head to head between the Mazda and Subaru.
The Legacy GT spec B is an all wheel drive turbo charged midsize sedan that costs close the Mazda and doesn't have the "boy racer" look of the WRX STI Impreza.

But I want to know when we can expect this powertrain in the Fusion? Call it the SHO since SVT is essentially dead. Ford could use the image boost.

Focus (Euro C1) and Mazda3 selling like hot cakes in China! Why can't Ford sell this in US??

2006-03-13T09:33:00.001-05:00

Here's an article discussing how well the new Focus and Mazda3 are selling in China. Every time I read an article like this, I want to smack whoever at FoMoCo made the decision not to bring the new Focus here. Again, the world gets new improved, and in the US we get warmed over mediocre. Igor a new commenter here, from the Foculjet forums says that a new Focus is due in 2008. I believe it's long overdue and by 2008 I'll be writing a new blog called "I remember when Ford built cars, do you?"

French own company starts first large BioFuel production, it's a begining

2006-03-13T09:31:00.001-05:00

A promissing story over at AutoBlog, on a French owned Agri-Business starting large scale production of Bio Diesel. I'd like to see more American owned business take this leap, and I think we will. The unique oportunity we may see here, is that companies not ordinarilly associated with fuel production, can use what would be natural byproducts of their operations to help in the production of alternative fuels. Just think Anheiser Bush or Miller Beer could be filling your tank? Or how about Purina, the makers of animal feed? It's not such a stretch when you realize they have half the infrastructure in place, and it gives them a way to diversify with little risk.

The large oil companies can't be trusted to volutarilly make the switch to bio fuels, it would be like asking a crack dealer to switch to candy. So maybe what the US needs is legislation to incentivize bio fuel production and distribution. I had read recently that Ford Motor Company was lobbying in Washington. If Brazil and Sweeden can do it, why not the US?

I'm not so naieve as to believe that a sudden availability will slash our dependance on foreign oil over night. It will take years for our current vehicles to reach the end of their lives and be replaced by new ones. But with government tax breaks for owners and manufacturers to convert some older vehicles for Ethanol or E85, and the fact that Diesel vehicles require no retrofit at all. It could be possible within 10-15 years to cut our use of foreign oil by as much as 50%. It's going to be a cumulative effort of alternative fuel production and distribution, more fuel efficient powertrains, partial retrofit of existing vehicles and education of consumers.

I'm sure that E85 retrofits for older classic cars would be minimal and performance could be improved.

Review of Ford Falcon from Australia

2006-03-13T09:03:00.001-05:00

It's no secret that I love the Australian Ford Falcon, and think that it should be here in the US. So as part of my policy of promotion for the Falcon, I offer you this link to an article reviewing the new Falcon's base model. You know for a "base" model it comes very well equiped, check some of the standard features.

White flag of surrender

2006-03-10T15:07:00.000-05:00

There's a piece at AutoBlog with a link to Newsweek, that seems kind of stupid to me. The article discusses whether the domestic auto manufacturers should follow the lead of Harley Davidson, and cloak itself in an all American persona, what they call playing the "America Card." And while this could be working for Harley Davidson, that's because it's a much smaller market for motorcycles than Cars and Trucks. Not that the big three (2 1/2 ) don't do this already with Trucks, they do, and Toyota is trying to squeeze into that full size truck market. But pulling back into some segregated "American" mode isn't going to help.

AutoBlog rightly comments that it could be just waving a white flag in surrender. Giving up on certain market segments to concentrate on the more profitable sectors, such as Muscle Cars, Trucks and SUVs. It doesn't make sense to me, why give up any segment of the market. If the domestic brands would build interesting vehicles for the US market, like the do for the world market, and make sure quality was "Job 1" then they wouldn't need to concede defeat. I've pointed out many of Ford's offerings around the world, and how well they compete with Japanese and European makes. Why can't they do that here? Now is not the time to be the "Surrender monkeys" of the Auto Industry. Now is the time to innovate, bring new models with more efficient powertrains and exciting styling. Instead of "Dave" we should be getting the "Kinetic" designs that Ford is offering elsewhere. GM and Chrysler too, they offers some unique models and concepts for Europe and elsewhere, that never come to these shores.

The domestic auto makers, need to fight as if their very existence depended on it, because it does.

Ford Ka news at AutoBlog

2006-03-10T13:35:00.000-05:00

There's a piece on AutoBlog, that links to a story at AutoExpress, about the new Ford Ka and it's Fiat 500 platform mate. There's a mistake in the AutoBlog piece, can anyone tell me what it is? I've talked about this before, not in the best light either. Check my previous post here; Dumb move

The Mazda BT50, their version of the new Ranger

2006-03-10T12:00:00.001-05:00

OK, more Ranger/Mazda B series truck news. Just days after the anouncement of the new Ranger in Bankok, to nobody's surprise, Mazda unveiled their new BT-50 pickup.
It's identical to the new Ranger, and built in the same plant. So you'll notice the styling and specs are very close. The name change to BT-50 is supposed to designate it's half way status between a small truck and a large truck. Much is being made about it's 1 ton payload capacity. I think that's metric ton.
Styling is just as nice as the ranger. If you want to read more on it, here are several sites doing reviews;Bangkok Post CarKeys UK CarGuide Australia Car Today, South Africa

All the reveiws a glowing, as this new Ranger/BT-50 are great trucks.

More New Ranger over at MPH

2006-03-09T13:05:00.001-05:00

The new Ranger from Thailand is being rolled out Europe, and MPH has the story and more pictures here MPH Online including new crew cab. Now you can tell me that this new Thai Ranger isn't the greatest thing since sliced bread, but if it's going to Europe, it can't be crap either. I think that if this Ranger doesn't eventually make it to the US market, it will be one more big mistake on Ford's part.

Ford Focus C-Max 4x4? over at Jalopnik

2006-03-09T10:20:00.001-05:00

Europe seems to be the land of mini vans, although they avoid that label, preferring MPV or People Mover. And Ford seems to have a full spread for the market. Here is the Ford Focus C-Max. I've already posted photos this week of the Galaxy and S-Max, so you can see the family resemblance among them. Based on the C1 Euro Focus platform, this is a neat little package. And Jalopnik points to spyphotos of a possible 4x4 version.
If you want a Focus C-Max in the United States, buy a Mazda5, they're both C1 based. I believe the Focus version came first, as I know the C-max has been out for a few years.
Again with a glass roof. Ford can't seem to deliver a decent mini van in the US, but boy they've got some nice options in Europe.
This is the Fusion MPV, based on Fiesta mechanicals. So this would be the smallest, then the C-Max, S-Max and finally the Galaxy. These are their car based MPVs.
And this Ford EcoSport is a 4x4 version of the UK Fusion, sold in Latin America and possibly headed to the US.
And if the Galaxy is too small how about the Toureno ? This I believe is based on the Transit commercial van from Ford's European line.
No glass roof or sporty styling, I'm not sure if this is still offered.

But it's interesting that Ford can make not 1 but 4 interesting MPV/Mini Vans in Europe and we got the FreeStar??????

European push for Alternative Energy at AutoBlog

2006-03-09T09:17:00.001-05:00

In an interesting post at AutoBlog, they discuss briefly European initatives toward alternative fuels. A new European organization called Alliance for Synthetic Fuels in Europe ASFE see the United Press International press release , is trying to develop and encourage the use of synthetic fuels made from natural gas (GTL) coal (CTL) and BioMass (BTL.) AutoBlog quote : "ASFE is apparently touting synthetic fuels as Europe's solution to reducing its petroleum dependency, in contrast to the U.S. government's promotion of ethanol."

I think any program that works towards the reduction of reliance on petrolium is a good thing. But as a layman, I notice a couple of problems and questions. First is GTL or Gas to Liquid, the gas is Natural Gas, which burns cleaner than Gasoline, but still releases greenhouse gases and is not an unlimited resource. CTL or Coal to Liquid, is worse in my opinion, again not a renewable resource, and also a polutant as bad as petrolium. The last BTL or BioMass to Liquid, well they're not clear on that, but that seems to be the cleanest of the three. Here's a definition I found online for Biomass . As it states, the "green-ness" of the biomass varies on what is used.

I still think that for the US, Bio Diesel and Ethanol are the nearest solution for our indepndance from foreign oil. The benefits would be to our economy, health, environment and national security.

MPH gives me my Reflex fix for the day

2006-03-08T19:29:00.001-05:00

After my last post depressed the hell out of me, I was happy to see an article about my new obsession the Reflex over at MPH. Maybe this can take my mind off what Ford is doing to drive itself to oblivion.

Are these nails in Ford's coffin?

2006-03-08T12:29:00.001-05:00

Is Mark Fields going to be the Grim Reaper at Ford Motor Company? Is he the one to drive the nail in Ford's North American Coffin? It seems that some fo the rumors and anouncements around Ford would indicate so. Or in the least, the death of anything remotely interesting.
Latest is the decision to eliminate SVT's operations and with the exception of the Shelby GT500 Mustang, models. This on it's own is not enough to kill Ford. It's more a culmination of decisions and indecision that will result in the slow agonzing death of Ford Motor Company. SVT was a great operation, that inspired Chrysler's SRT line. But it's not the exclusivity of dealers, which now may result in lawsuits against Ford, that is the problem. It's more the appearance that Ford is giving up on one more aspect of business. Retreating from Special Vehicles. While GM sells SS badged versions of their Chevy brand, and Chrysler spreads SRT around all of their brands, Ford cuts the lifeline. It's just one sign of weakness and lack of vision.
Here's another sign of impending doom. I've been complaining for months that Ford has a great new Chassis for the Focus and yet in the US we get a facelifted last generation model. The excuses I'd read online and in the press were related to cost of production and price point. The new C1 Focus would cost more to produce and therefore the price would have to go up. But I've said it before, I don't buy that excuse. The Focus C1 is offered for sale in every market Ford sells in, with the exception of Canada, the United States and Mexico. It is built and sold in China and Russia and marketed in South America, Asia, The Middle East, Africa and Europe. That same chassis underpins the Mazda3, which is a competitor for the US Ford Focus. So how can it be too expensive for Ford, but not Mazda? How can it make sense in Russia and China and not the US? I've heard arguments that in these other markets, a Focus is not an entry level vehicle, while in the US it is. Bullsh*t, a Focus shouldn't be an entry level car in the US either, there should be a model below the Focus in price and size, like the Fiesta. Not just for price point, but for economy. The Japanese and Korean competitors are about to bring new B segment models like the Honda Fit here to compete with the anticipated flood of cheap Chinese imports.
Ford has been rumored to be letting the Ranger die, just as they unviel a new and improved Ranger for the rest of the world. Another stupid decision if it's true. The Ford Ranger was the best selling Compact/MidSize pickup in the US for over 15 years. When every other manufacturer made improvements to their trucks, Ford sat there and let the Ranger become stale. As every other manufacturer introduced a crew cab version of their compact pickup, Ford left the Ranger/Mazda twins out of that growing new segment, even though they sell one of the most popular crew cab compact pickups in the world, the Ranger. Was this just to save sales of the Explorer Sport Trac? That model that was passed over when the Explorer was redesigned, and is only now being freshened? Not that the Sport Trac isn't a decent model, but it's small useless cargo area can't compete with the likes of Toyota and Nissan or even GM's triplets. So why let one of the most sucessful compact trucks die? I wish I knew. The new Ranger has sharp styling and with it's 2 Diesels could position Ford to take advantage of a possible resurgance of Diesel powered vehicles in the US. As they push for alternative energy with their "Drive for Innovation" don't they recognize the benefits of having 2 diesel powertrains available for a totally redesigned Ranger?
The Panther platform triplets, once very proffitable for Ford, are now slowly being killed off. While Chrysler, GM and even Hyundai recognize the market for rear wheel drive, Ford plans to replace these cars with versions of the Ford 500. The new Dodge Charger and Magnum will see service as police and taxi fleets. Why would Ford leave a platfrom from 1979 in service for so long without any plan for a replacement? Why when they have a great rear wheel drive platform in Australia, wouldn't they tap that asset for it's replacement? There are rumors now of a Mustang based sedan that could be out in the next decade. But why the delay.
So as Mark Fields counts his Million Dollar bonus for staying through the tough times, I wonder if there will ever be good times for Ford again? I keep hearing stupid decisions, and surrender from different models segments. I almost forgot the mini van, I mean "people mover." It seems Ford realizes their mini van is crap, so they want to bring out the new Fairlane people mover and distance themselves from stink.

It's lights out for SVT according to AutoBlog and Inside Line

2006-03-08T09:23:00.000-05:00

This will be the last vehicle to bear an SVT badge, well on the wheels anyway. According to an article at Inside Line, refferenced over at AutoBlog, the SVT division is being dismantled. So the Shelby GT500 will be an even more collectable model, not only the last Ford to carry a Shelby name, but also the last SVT vehicle. I can see them on E-Bay already.
It should have been no surprise, after the anouncement that the SVT Adrenaline was canceled. 2004 was the last year for the SVT division's models, Lightning, Mustang and Focus. There was talk of a crop of new products like the Adrenaline Sport Trac, a Fusion and more.
But now if you want a fast Fusion, buy a Mazdaspeed6, if you can get one of the only 5000.
And if you want an SVT Focus, buy a Volvo S40 or Mazdaspeed3.

So if you want any form of excitement from Ford (except Mustang), buy one of their partner brands?

Iosis Mondeo at WorlCarFans, via AutoBlog

2006-03-08T07:57:00.000-05:00

AutoBlog has a piece on the Iosis concept and speculation that it will be the new Ford Mondeo for Europe. Not really new, but interesting none the less. The Mondeo is a nice looking vehicle, but the Iosis is realy beautiful.
Ford had stated that the Iosis, signals the new "Kinetic" designs for Ford Europe. Meanwhile we in the US get "Dave." Who is Dave? Why do I want Dave? Why can't I have Kinetic? This type of thinking on Ford's part is what is wrong with the auto industry in general and Ford specificaly. "Dave" is stupid, Kinetic is cool and "Innovative."

Volvo, the only way to get some great European Ford models?

2006-03-07T13:23:00.000-05:00

Volvo is owned by Ford Motor Company, and purists were worried that the brand would loose identity and become nothing more than another version of Mercury. I don't think they need to worry, because despite platform sharing and to a lesser degree powertrains, Volvo has been able to maintain it's distinct identity and expand it's lineup and market share. But for Ford fanatics, Volvo could be seen as an opportunity to buy some of the best European Fords, that we don't get here. Take the soon to be released Volvo C30. It shares it's platform with the Euro C1 Focus.
In fact, Ford's new hot hatch owes it's power to Volvo. I uses the I5 Turbo from Volvo to achieve it's 240 hp. So if you want a Focus ST, wait for the Volvo or Mazda version.
How about this beauty? The new Volvo C70 hard top convertible, built on the C1 platform as well. With a neat hard top that slides down to create this crisp convertible.
Like this Ford Focus Cabrio, which it's based on.
Do you like that new Volvo S60? Nice car, sharp styling, great supsension.
Shares the platform from the Euro Ford Mondeo, as does the Jaguar X Type.
So you see the pictures of the S-Max and Galaxy mini vans from Europe, and wonder like I do, why we can't get them here in the US?
The Styling of these two MPVs is crisp and muscular almost, quite a nice shape. And they're built on Stretched C1 platforms. So the Volvo powertrains will fit easily. Mercedes brought their mini van R Type here, why couldn't Ford bring either of these MPVs over as a Volvo.
And while they're at it, slap that Volvo grill on this, let it tag along for the ride??

James Bond is a wuss?

2006-03-07T13:12:00.000-05:00

All over the net, there are stories that the new actor playing James Bond in the upcoming movie, can't drive a standard transmission. That was shocking enough, but forgivable. But then came the stories that Ford paid a ton of money to the film's producers so that 007 would drive a Mondeo. Now don't get me wrong the Mondeo is a great car, but it's not what Bond should drive, not unless he's retired or undercover as an insurance salesman.
This is more like it for James Bond!
Or, if it's got to have 4 doors and an Automatic, how about this! She looks like a Bond girl.

Jalopnik has the new Thai Ranger

2006-03-07T12:32:00.001-05:00

Not good news for US Ford Ranger fans, but here it is the new Ford Ranger from Thailand.
Click on over to Jalopnik for the story. Then click on through to LeftLaneNews for further pics and commentary.

According to their story, the Range will be killed of entirely in the US. Now if you are offended by strong language, please skip the rest.

How fucking stupid is Ford?? Kill the Ranger! Why not kill the idiot at Ford that suggested that? The Ranger was at one time the best selling compact pickup in the US, for 15 years!!! Why introduce such a great Ranger for the rest of the world, with not 1 but 2 great new Diesel powerplants, and not bring it to the US? I am outraged! I've been a huge Ford fan for years, but this and other bumbling moves over recent years have really been too fucking much!!

First the Focus gets improved world wide, and not here, now the Ranger gets the same treatment. Don't even get me started on the Crown Victoria and Australian Ford Falcon. It seems as if Ford is just giving up on the North American market. Now is not the time to give up on any segment of the market. With fuel prices expected to rise again, and the emergence of alternative fuels like E85 and BioDiesel, it's always been my opinion that Ford would be in a position to really shine, simply by taking models and technologies from their overseas operations and apply them to the new US market.

Even without the Diesels, a new Ranger could really recapture share in the midsize/compact truck market. I'm hoping these stories are wrong. I truly don't want to believe that Ford Management is that stupid.

Sorry about the strong language, but this is one of those things I feel strongly about.

Recap of Alternative Fuel posts; how to save the world ?

2006-03-07T12:21:00.001-05:00

I realized recently that I've been ranting about Ethanol/E85, BioDiesel, Alternative Energy and Fuel Eocnomy for months now. So for no real reason I went back several months of my archives and looked up how many times. So here's the list;

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Each number will bring you to a past post on the subject, going as far back as last September.

Blogs, what why and how, thoughts from RaceDriven and AutoBloggers

2006-03-07T10:59:00.000-05:00

RaceDriven and Dave at AutoBloggers both discuss different aspects of Blogs and blogging.
What is a blog, how do you get started and how do you conduct yourself are discussed in these articles.

My two cents is this; a blog or web log/journal is supposed to be your thoughts on a subject that interests you. Many people are inspired by what they read online or in the mainstream media, and comment on what they read. If you comment on someone else's work, it's only right that you acknowledge their work. It's suggested that you link to the original work and give a "hat tip" to that author. Much of what I write is just that, inspired by other blogs, magazines, televison shows or even emails from readers. If I am inspired by someone else, I will acknowledge that, and link either to their main page or the article in particular. In the least I will mention a reader's name, like Philip who recently wrote me about Ford in Europe and his Ranger. Under US law, once you hit the publish button on your blog, it's considered copyrighted material, which means that it may be copied only under guidelines of fair use or under lisence from the author. Some blogs are professional as is the case for www.autoblog.com or www.mph-online.com and www.jalopnik.com , others are just enthusiasts like www.theautoprophet.blogspot.com , www.tapscottbehindthewheel.blogspot.com or www.racedriven.com . Brian has some great advice for those new bloggers who want to get exposed and Dave of MPH brings up issues that I and Brian have discussed in the past. Splogs are blogs in name only, where they harvest other people's blogs and repost. Many splogs are set up for financial gain, through the use of advertising. These splogs skirt the law, and in some cases blatantly spit in the face of the law and decency.

I say this, if you enjoy a hobby, like automobiles, and feel you want to have your say, do it.
Blogging is free and easy. Services like Blogger make it easy to get started, and you don't have to be a tech guy to use them, I'm not. The more the merrier, but check out Brian and Dave's articles and my archives for some background on blogging and the dark side splogging.

Brooklyn Bob talks about AutoWeek's Volvo mini van story

2006-03-07T10:14:00.000-05:00

Brooklyn Bob or 4DriversOnly and CarsCarsCars! fame, writes today about an article over at AutoWeek, discussing a possible new Volvo mini van. Mini Vans have been around for over 20 years now, and many companies didn't make the jump into that market for various reasons. Volvo was mostly imune because of their strong reputation and capable station wagons. Even SUVs lured many into that market, Volvo trying to avoid the jump with their V70XC, but finally giving in with their excelent S80 based XC90 crossover SUV. They are even pumping up the V40 a little to create the XC50 pictured here.
So AutoWeek speculates that Volvo may take advantage of the Ford family relationship and bring out their own mini van based on Galaxy or S-Max platform. A few years ago, I would have said no way, Volvo would never do this. But today, after even Mercedes has joined the mini van tribe (Oh excuse me "Grand Sport Tourer") with it's new R class, I'm not so sure Volvo can avoid it. They could do worse than an S-Max or Galaxy base, at least it's not the FreeStar.

Rate your mechanic? A new site submitted for your evaluation..

2006-03-07T08:53:00.000-05:00

How do you find a mechanic to fix your car? Here's a new site, that's been submitted, where you can search for a mechanic in your area, and see how others have rated him. Chris W. sent me an email informing me of his new service, I checked it out and the idea is promissing. There were no listings for my area, so I can assume that the service is in it's infancy. But it's a great idea. Hell if you can look up a dentist online, why not a mechanic?

Check it out, see if there's anyone in your area, or if you feel you want to submit your favorite or less than favorite mechanic and garage. If the site meets your approval let me know.

Revisit the SVO

2006-03-06T12:53:00.001-05:00

Today so much is made of the Honda Civic Si making 197 hp, with little mention of it's 138 lb ft of torque. But 20 years ago, Ford had a 4cyl hot hatch that made 200 hp and 200 lb ft of torque. The Ford SVO Mustang. Powerful and balanced, with decent fuel economy. It was compared favorably with BMW 3 series of the time. Made only for a few years, it was the most forward thinking Mustang ever built. To compare the 1986 Mustang GT with V8 only made 20 hp more, and because of the weight of the engine, handling while good was not as good as the SVO.
So here's an idea, couldn't Ford bring out a new SVO? With all of the technological advances made in fuel injection and engine management, the same 2.3 or now 2.5 I4 could easily put out 250 hp or more. The lighter weight of the engine in an already excellent chassis, would make it a real autobahn burner.
Dodge SRT4 230 hp . Wouldn't stand a chance against a new SVO Mustang.
Chevy Cobalt SS Supercharged with 210 hp. An SVO would make it look silly.

Hell, it would make any tuner vehicle except maybe the EVO and WRX look like it was standing still. The advantage of all wheel drive may not even be enough.

So what do you think? A new SVO turbo 4 Mustang?

Ford B-Segment possibilities

2006-03-06T12:34:00.001-05:00

The Fiesta has been on the market in Europe and most of the world for 30 years now. And this little car, could be one of the best investments Ford ever made. It's first truely successful front wheel drive car, and the first "world car" being exported to all markets including the US in the mid 70's.
Fiesta mechanicals are found under diverse models world wide. Like the Ka in Europe.
The Sporty Puma, which had it's own racing series in Europe.
The Ikon, which is sold in Asia and Latin American markets.
The Bantam/Courier panel vans and small pickups.
The EcoSport mini SUV sold in Latin America. And the Fiesta mechanicals have so much more to give. This platform could be the base for some very interesting models from Ford.
How about the Faction? An easy competitor for the Dodge Hornet. Chrysler is shopping for a partner to produce the Hornet. Ford doesn't need one, they have a ready chassis and facilities already tooled for it. All they need are body stampings.
The Fiesta based EcoSport and it's Duratorq powertrain are under the Bronco concept and possible production model.
And what better chassis to utilize to bring the Reflex to market? It would be like a new Puma.

I think the Fiesta chassis could be a huge hit for Ford, including in the US, where multiple models could be built on this chassis and powerplants. Everything from a base economy car, to a sports car and an off road model. All from such humble beginings.

Autoline Detroit, PSA Diesel Hybrid, and what it should mean for Ford.

2006-03-06T12:09:00.001-05:00

I was watching Autoline Detroit, as I do every Sunday, and John McElroy was talking about new technologies and had a special segment on PSA (Citreon/Peugeot) Diesel Hybrid concept. He was fawning over it, and with it's combined fuel economy of 70 mpg, it's impressive. But I was yelling at the TV screeen, trying to remind John, that PSA isn't the only one that has such a concept. The Ford Reflex is a Diesel Hybrid! Ok, maybe the Reflex isn't as close to production, and it's hybrid system not as practical. But Ford has Hybrid and Diesels in their product mix.
Why can't Ford, combine the two existing technologies into the Fiesta and beet PSA to market? After all, the Ford Duratorq Diesels are a joint design with PSA, so they have half already. Couldn't this be mated with a scaled down verison of the Escape Hybrid's transmission and electric motor system?

Pangra??

2006-03-06T11:43:00.000-05:00

The Pangra? Was apparently a dealer special and a kit available for do it yourselfers. But what is interesting about this, is the turbo. I was bored on the weekend and found this at Wikipedia.

AutoBlog points to the land of the rising sun, with more alternative fuel technology

2006-03-06T11:40:00.001-05:00

AutoBlog points to an article on Japanese research into alternative energy sources, including Ethanol. Now we've heard of several sources for Ethanol, crops like corn, soybean and switchgrass as well as Algae. But the Japanese are looking elsewhere.
Here, is where they're looking, cow manure. I don't think this is really a new idea. I mean..
Ask this guy nicely, and he may tell you how he made fuel from pig manure.

From what I've read online, algae seems to give the most output per acre, but what ever it takes.

Ford EX Concept, with 375 hp from a 4.0L SOHC V6?

2006-03-06T10:57:00.000-05:00

From the 2001 NAIAS in Detroit, the Ford EX concpet. Little more than a souped up dune buggy. I never pay attention to concepts like this, since they have no chance at production, and ussually have little that can translate into a production model. Or at least that's what I always told myself. Now that I've been taking another look at past concepts like the Faction, I'm seeing more potential than originally realized.
Now that may not be the case here, but there is something I like none the less. This Ford 4.0 SOHC V6 makes 375 hp and 410 lb ft of torque. This is the same 4.0 from the Mustang and Ranger. Obviously overbuilt and supercharged with an intercooler. But cool even if it has a snowball's chance in hell of ever seeing production, engine or buggy.

I love Pintos, am I the only one?

2006-03-03T13:11:00.000-05:00

OK, get it out of your system now, laugh all you want. I love Pintos, especially wagons. I had a 79 Pinto sedan during my college years. It wasn't cool, it wasn't fast, but it was fun and fairly dependable. The Pinto came out in 1971 as Ford's first domestically produced sub compact car. Their answer to Toyota and Datsun imports. And in 1972 the sedan/hatchback were followed by the wagon. Click the header for a comprehensive look at the Pinto, no punches pulled, the good bad and the ugly, with the story of exploding gas tanks in detail.
My parents had 2 Pintos, a brown sedan and a blue wagon. I loved that wagon. They really were practicle little cars, with decent performance and economy. They first came out with the 2000cc 4 cyl engine, then the 2300 cc and finally the 2800cc V6. Both automatic and manual transmissions were offered. The Pinto was built from 1971 to 1980, and despite it's reputation sold very well.
I'll go even further, I love Pintos, I prefer wagons and would even take a woody version. The Pinto Squire. I have a vague recolection of car shopping with my parents as a youngster, and falling in love with a woody Pinto Squire with this funky plaid interior.
I forget what year these panel versions began to apear, I think it was 76 or 77, but they were sort of cool, with mag wheels and stripes, and even the van style porthole window. this one is a 79 Rallye version, there was also a Cruisin version. Admitedly kind of silly, but what the hell it was the 70's.
The Pinto was the foundation for the Mustang II, which love it or hate it was a great little car for Ford, selling very well also. So a lot of mods for Mustang IIs will work for the Pinto, including installing a V8 engine.
Now my sedan, a 79 didn't even look this good. It was an MPG Pony, bare bones stripper with AM radio and 4 spd manual. But they had Cruisin sedans as well as Stallion and ESS editions, offering different stripe and decal packages. The sedan was fine, but the Wagon has the fold down rear seat and all that room for stuff.
I've looked on E-Bay and other sites over the years, looking for a decent Pinto Wagon, but prices are getting high, and most decent ones are quite a distance away. One of these days though I'd like to pick up one.

Pickups in Europe, some information from Philip

2006-03-03T10:15:00.000-05:00

Europe has always been a bit of a puzzle for me, being born and living in the United States all my life. The biggest thing was always their disdain for Pickup Trucks. But a funny thing is happening there now. Pickups are increasing in poplularity. One recent reader/commentor here, Philip from Belgium wrote me recently that he is waiting for delivery of his new Ford Ranger. Like the one pictured above, it's a 4 door, what we in the US call a Crew Cab. From his notes and what I've read recently on Wikipedia, I've learned that 4 door pickups are more popular world wide, than our traditional 2 door pickups. And Pickups are replacing SUVs in Europe, because of fiscal advantages, based on the exposed cargo box. These advantages are do to with registration fees, which can be quite high.
Philip asked me about the Explorer Sport Trac, which is based on the last generation Explorer and has a more sedan like interior and shorter cargo box. I've never been a fan of the Sport Trac, instead wanting a crew cab Ranger like the rest of the world gets (including Mexico.) But in parts of Europe, the Ranger Crew Cab is a better choice, because it's longer cargo box ( 5 ft as opposed to 4 ft) meets requirements for these fee loopholes. The rule that Philip pointed out, is that to qualify for the advantage, the cargo bed must be at least 50% of the wheelbase. So the Sport Trac is not a benefit overseas.
In the US, we're seeing more crew cabs being offered in "compact" and "midsize" trucks, yet Ford and Mazda twins do not offer crew cabs. Hopefully the new redesigned Thailand Ranger will extend into the US market with it's crew cab. Instead Ford offers, this "Super Cab" extended cab with half doors and jump seats. No wonder the Ranger is languishing in the US sales.
Philip wanted to see a picture of my truck, so here it is. A 1999 Ford Ranger XLT with the OffRoad package, in standard cab with short bed (6 ft) in dark green with the 4.0L petrol V6 and 5 spd manual and electronic 2 spd transfer case for the 4 wheel drive. It's my third truck, and one of the best vehicles I've ever owned, reliability has been very good, with 3 recalls handled easilly by my local dealer in the 7 years I've owned it and only 54,000 miles on the odometer. I've used this as my primary transportation for several years, taking it on vacations and using it for all sorts of work. I have a bed extender bar, that allows me to lower the tailgate and haul long loads. I've taken it offroad for work and fun, and although the ground clearance isn't huge at roughly 9 inches, it's been adequate, and the optional skid/scuff plates have probably saved me major repairs several times. It can cruies on the highway at 85 mph with ease, and gas milage is only moderate at 20 mpg on the highway and 13 mpg city. Top speed, or at least as brave as I've come is 100 mph. It's unstoppable in snow, and the anti lock brakes have helped keep me on the pavement quite often.

Euro Ford MPVs, the way they should be done.

2006-03-03T09:40:00.000-05:00

A reader, Philip from Belgium, wrote the other day, and commented on the Geneva Auto Show. He was looking forward to my comments on the show, and Ford's offerings. Well, I've never been to Geneva, and can only rehash what the auto rags have shown us. But I can of course put my own spin on it. This stylish people mover is the Ford S-Max for Europe. Look at those lines, it's smooth and exciting, well for a mini van it is. And style seems to be what seperates mini vans in the US and Europe.
This picture is of the Ford concept that became the S-Max. It's close to what will be built. Mini vans are more upscale in Europe, their design is just as important as sedans and coupes, not an afterthought like the ones we've gotten here.
Look at the interior on the Galaxy mpv, it's functional and comfortable and almost luxurious. Check out the sunroofs. Both the S-Max and it's slightly larger sibling Galaxy get similar roof treatments.
Maybe if Ford sold something like the Galaxy in the US, they wouldn't have to "abandon" the mini van market. Well, they're not really abandoning, they're trying to go stealth with the new Fairlane. The Fairlane, relying on the crossover label and SUV styling to distract people from the past crap.
And this is the crap I speak of. Ford FreeStar, a vehicle so bad, it's bad reputation affected sales of another new Ford the FreeStyle. Originally the WindStar, it's always been a decent value, with mediocre styling and dull driving dynamics. Ford got into mini vans late in the US, first with the AeroStar based on Ranger Mechanicals and then this Wind/Free Star, based loosely on Taurus mechanicals (I think, I know they shared engine and transmissions originally.)

Why can Ford produce such stylish, efficient and interesting vehicles for Europe and not for the US?

Didn't Mark Fields just get his new position at Ford?

2006-03-02T20:44:00.000-05:00

Mark Fields, whose star rose so far so quick at Ford just started his new position as President of the Americas in September right? So why the hell does he need a "retention bonus" ensuring he'll stay 2 years? The guy is only 45, this makes no sense to me. Check the story out at the Detroit News. I found this over at Jalopnik, and nearly choked. Compensation for executives has just gotten out of hand. He's only been in the job 5 months and they're worried he's going to jump ship? How do they justify this bonus, when they're getting set to lay off 30,000 people? The bib brass ones on this guy are amazing. We better see great things from him, or him and Bill Ford Jr can pack their frigging bags and head out of town.

Why did Ford drop off the Consumer's Reports top 10 list?

2006-03-02T11:28:00.000-05:00

For years, as long as I can remember the one auto review you could always trust to be unbiased has always been the Consumer Reports. Their reputation is bulletproof, because they take no advertising from manufacturers. The cars they test are bought from regular dealers and not prepped by manufaturers. Some criticise them as not being Automobile Guys, and they're not. The magazine is best known for testing appliances and electronics. But they report on everything from Tylenol to Thunderbirds, and they do it from strictly objective testing. And for years you could always count on at least one Domestic Auto to be on their list, well most years anyway. But this year not one, Honda has 5 of the 10 spots and the remaining 5 are all foreign as well.
The Civic knocked the Ford Focus off the list this year. With it's total redesign, and sharp styling, you can't knock Honda, they tried and won. But how could Consumer Reports overlook the new Focus?
I mean it's a world class car, that's been totally redesigned and recognized for styling and quality. How could Consumers Reports overlook this sterling example ???
OH THAT'S RIGHT, WE DON'T GET THAT FOCUS!! WE GET THIS STEAMING PILE OF CRAP! Why can you buy the new Focus everywhere but Canada, The United States and Mexico? Ford says it's because of cost. BULLSHIT!!!!!!!
Ford builds and sells the new C1 Focus in China, Russia and everywhere else. It's a better car than we get, and the underpinnings of the new Mazda3, that you can buy here, for the same price as a Focus.

Now they picked the Accord and it's a good car, but I'm hoping that maybe next year we'll see the Fusion/Milan in that slot. I've driven the Fusion and the Mazda6 that it's based on, and they're find cars, both have good handling and power (I drove the 4 cyl) for their class. I've driven Accords, both old and new, and they're dull. But obviously they are better than the Fusion in Consumer Reports' tests.

I know I'm biased, but the Focus (C1 Euro version) could really have beaten the pants off the Civic, really.

AutoBlog article on Ralph Nader's criticism of the Auto Industry.

2006-03-02T11:02:00.000-05:00

AutoBlog discusses and links to a piece by Ralph Nader criticising the Domestic Auto Industry. And even if you don't like the man, it's a good read.
Nader's biggest claim to fame, after being considered a spoiler in the last presidential election, was this book on the auo industry he wrote in the early 60's. And ever since auto enthusiasts have dislike him, even when he was right. I had read that from the time he wrote that book and all through out his government career, he never bought a car for personal use, but instead drove whatever was available at the government motorpool.
Now not only is his article interesting, but he comments over at AutoBlog are amusing. The venom that many spew, and I doubt they even read the article. He's not saying anything that's new or shocking, he's repeating what many have said for the last 25 years or more, that the Domestic Auto Industry has been it's own worst enemy, and is at fault for much of what is happening today. And you know what? He's right. Not entirely right, but in the big picture way, very generally and vaguely right. The Auto Industry did stall safety and efficiency legislation and regulations. The Auto industry did abandon the small car market in favor of the higher proffit SUV market. The Auto Indsustry does have technologies available to make better cars, that we don't see because it would cost them and us money. But let's take a step back here, it was Ford who started using laminated safety glass and seat belts before either were legislated. It was GM that pioneered such technologies as air bags and anit lock brakes, even if they weren't the first to mass market them.
The image of Auto Industry "Fat Cats" sitting on their behinds isn't strictly fair, but there is merrit to some of what Nader says. But that doesn't mean I believe the conspiracy theories of Detroit keeping the 100 mpg carb hidden for 30 years. It may be that while some of the inventions worked, but after further testing were found to be dangerous, or flawed.

Yeah I know, the "Fat Cats" was a stretch, but I wanted so much to post that picture. Sue me, I'm a cat lover and find it funny.

Mercury and Lincoln concepts, some winners and losers

2006-03-02T10:17:00.000-05:00

The Mercury Messenger, from comments here I would say this one stirred many peoples souls, but not mine. I think it's ugly, possibly salvagable, but why? The Messenger is supposed to sit on Mustang's chassis, and be a new Cougar. But for the extra money they'll charge for the Mercury version, I would insist on several things you can't get from Mustang. First the IRS, second a moonroof. But I still don't like it. The Mustang is a success because it's a Mustang, and it's price is within reach of many buyers, different styling without further content and innovation, would make this just a re-badged Mustang, and Mercury doesn't need that.
The Lincoln Continental concept, came out at the same time as the 427 but didn't get the reaction or attention. But you can see that styling cues from this are visible in the new Zephyr (I hate that Mark Z name.) This should be the new flagship from Lincoln, built on a rear wheel drive platform, it has suicide rear doors like the iconic Lincolns of the 60's. I'd love to see a 4 door convertible version too.
I thnk this one was such a no brainer, it should have been built. Built on the T-Bird Lincoln LS chassis, this 4 seater convertible could have been a huge sucess. I had read that it's only problem was it's close association with Jaques Nasser.

The NaviCross, what a turd. I remember seeing this at the New York Auto Show, and it's much uglier in person. But even if I don't like it, it's much more innovative than what Lincoln is bringing out.

FoMoCo Concepts from recent years, The Good The Bad and the Stupid

2006-03-01T14:52:00.000-05:00

The SynUs concept, someone at Ford should have been fired for this one. An urban/youth vehicle, it looks like a Brinks truck that got left in the wash too long and shrunk. This was just a STUPID idea. There is no excuse for it, what the hell were they thinking?
A Mild hit on the show circuit, and it may have gotten the nod. I like this one.
The Model U, at first I hated it, the whole idea of a "recyclable car" did little to excite me. And that eggshell white color doesn't really inspire any emotion. But it's not offensive. It's the type of thing that could grow on you, if they got all the details right.
This is the second Fortynine concept, the first was a black hardtop, that looked like a 49 Ford business coupe updated with big rims and everything smooth. I loved the two of them. They were on the T-Bird/Lincoln LS chassis, and while I acknowledge they have limited apeal, I want one.
Of course my new obsession, the Reflex. Built on Ford's B Segment chassis, with a Diesel Electric Hybrid system that gave it all wheel drive and an odd 2+1 seating arrangement. Get rid of the complicated drivetrain, and single rear seat, and build it ASAP.
The new Ranger for the rest of the world? May be built in Thailand, and possibly imported to the US? I like the styling and of course the crew cab. Let's see what the future holds for Ranger.
The SuperChief concept for the next gen of SuperDuty trucks? Has a supercharged Hydrogen V10 that Ford has been testing in shuttle buses, so never say never. It's probably one of the least offensive large truck concepts I've seen.
I must have missed this one in 2003, the Faction B-Segment coupe/mpv? At first I hated it, then it grew on me, and now I see Dodge getting applause for their Hornet concept and wonder why this couldn't go head to head with that. Again built on Fiesta mechanicals. It could be fun.
The Iosis, the future face of Ford in Europe. What can I say? It's graceful and sleek and the proportions seem just right. It should have come here. We get "Dave" and Europe gets this, what's wrong with Ford?

The Fairlane MPV looks like a go to replace the Ford FreeStar mini van. The more I look at it, it reminds me of a MINI on steroids. It could just be the white roof. I like it, it's kind of bland, but not ugly.

Shawn wants the GR-1 and Reflex, and so do I

2006-03-01T10:16:00.001-05:00

Shawn, a regular reader and commentor on this blog, in a recent comment on the Kabura, says he'd like to see the GR1 and Reflex built. And I agree, although I don't see the GR1 coming too soon.
In a way, the Reflex seems like the "Mini Me" of the GR1, especially in the silver. But it's a lower cost gamble for Ford, since it's underpinnings and powertrain are taken from Ford's European B Segement Fiesta. Building both the GR1 and Reflex would give Ford bookend performance models for the Mustang line.
The Ford GT, was a hell of an image boost for Ford, coming out just after the Centenial celebration. This car, who many lament over it's production end, was never really supposed to be a permanent addition to the lineup. It's expensive to produce and buy and limited in it's apeal. And when I say limited in it's apeal, I mean usefulness. Let's face it, everybody loves the looks and the performance. But it's not a car you can take to the country club or a night out. It's a toy for the very rich, and a bargain at $150k. But Ford originally said it would have a short run, and eventually be replaced by either the "Cobra" V10 roadster or the Shelby GR1 coupe.
The Mustang is an iconic model, with varying levles of performance, from the Base 210 hp V6, 300 hp GT and the 450 hp Shelby GT500 coming soon. Ford seems to have most of the bases covered with the Mustang, but it doesn't really. Ford needs a hot hatch type of car, like the SVT Focus that's gone, or even better the Focus ST from Europe (and the rest of the world.) And Ford could us a sporty sedan, like the rummored SVT Fusion. Ford has had them in the past, with the SHO Taurus or SVT Contour. A Reflex could be Ford's first rung on the performance ladder and the GR1 could be the top of the line.
Ford hasn't really had a head to head competitor for the Corvette, despite the original T-Bird or Shelby Cobras and GT350/500 Mustangs. And the new Corvette is an amazing package, you have several levels of performance, from the base 400 hp to the top of the line Z06 with 500 hp. And the Corvette, has decent lugage capacity for a 2 seat sports car, while still being able to run with Ferrari (in the case of the Z06.) With base prices south of $50k and topping out well under $100k, it's a tough act to follow.
Dodge gave it a shot with the Viper, which has asphalt busting power and handling, but not as practical as the Vette, and only a match for the Z06 at a higher price. The ride is harsher and although it's still on the market, it's not as practical as the Vette and not as fast as Ford's GT.
But Chrysler isn't just sitting back, they've shown this Firepower concept, with a V8 instead of the Viper's V10, and a little bit more luxury than race car.

When Ford gets their act together, the GR1 could be a model they want to consider. Bring out the Reflex now, and work toward the GR1. Sure they'd have to sell 100 Reflex for every 1 GR1, but both could be success in their own way.

Kabura????

2006-02-28T14:21:00.000-05:00

AutoBlog has a piece on some German journalists that got to drive the Mazda Kabura concept. This is a car that I had no faith in going to production, but now from everything I'm reading online, it's closer to reality than I could have dreamed. Sized between the MX5(Miata) and RX8, it's rear wheel drive and aside from it's 3+1 seating is a great prospect for a new sports car.
Now only if someone at Ford has the stones to bring the Reflex to life!

The new Focus Cabriolet

2006-02-28T13:48:00.000-05:00

This is a 1958 Ford Skyliner. I believe Ford was the first company to have a retractable hardtop convertible in 1957. Long before Lexus was even around. (An anonymous reader has corrected me, this is a 1959 Skyliner, not a 58)
And this is it's modern successor, the Focus Cabrio. Or for us in the US, the Volvo C70.
Top up or down, I think it's a very good looking car.
I'm not usually a fan of Brown cars, but I'd take this one, with a 2.0 TDCi and 6 spd manual.
Here's a 1989 European Escort Cabrio, another one we never got.
And the current Ford Street Ka drop top.
I think this is just a photoshop image, but it shows whata Mondeo Cabrio would look like.

Same again, but I found this on a Google image search listed as a Ford Capri Cabrio. No other information.

Why couldn't we get these European Ford drop tops??

Technical difficulties keep blog quiet for today.

2006-02-28T12:16:00.000-05:00

OK, I"m having computer problems, and don't think much will be posted today. When I get them sorted out, I'll be back.

Robert Farago of The Truth about Cars, predicts the death of Manual shifting

2006-02-27T14:48:00.000-05:00

Robert Farago over at The Truth about Cars web site, is saying that the days of the manual transmission are numbered. Well know he's right, but that doesn't make us happy about it. I think it was Cadilac in the late 30's that came out with the first automatic transmission, and by the 50's they were fairly common on American cars. I remember when I first saw a VW "semi-automatic" Beetle for the first time, I guess that was a step backwards. But manual transmissions have held on all this time, in trucks, performance vehicles and smaller economy cars. I remember learning on an automatic and then making the switch to manual shift. It requires a little more skill to drive a manual, but the benefits were always a feel or perception of better control, and of course more gears offering slightly better economy.
But automatics have come a long way from the 2 and 3 speed slushboxes of yesterday. I recall the first time I saw a 4 speed overdrive automatic, it bothered me that you couldn't access all the gears with the shifter. And today, there are even more gears. We went from 2 and 3 to 4 and now 5 and 6, with 7 speed automatics and of course there are CVT (Constant Variable Transmissions) that have an almost infinite number of ratios available with their two pulleys. Then you had "auto stick" and "manu-matic" sport modes and now Farago points to VW/BorgWarner's DSG paddle shift as the final nail in the clutch pedal's coffin.
Luckilly for those of us that like to shift for ourselves, and are lucky enough to find a manual transmission on a dealer's lot, we've got time. These transmissions are going to come first on top of the line and performance oriented models. I've never driven a 6 speed manual and don't want to miss out my chance, so I hope that it wil take time. Click on over and read Farago's article, he's got his finger on the pulse, while some of us have our heads in the sand.

Laforza, Italian built Ford powered SUV, that wanted to take some of the Range Rover thunder in the 90's

2006-02-27T13:06:00.000-05:00

The Laforza, which is Italian for "the Force", an italian luxury SUV powered by Ford. There's not a lot of information available on these, as they are no longer on the market and only produced and imported in low numbers. The AutoProphet spotted one the other day and posted on his blog about it. Then he suggested I post on it, since he knows that I'll post on anything even remotely Ford related.
For federalization Laforza chose the Ford 5.0 L motor from the Mustang. That meant that owners would have a reliable and easily serviced powertrain, and one less worry. As I recall, they came out around 1989 and were aimed squarely at Range Rover owners and others who wanted a more luxurious SUV. You have to remember that back then none of the Luxury brands made SUVs.
Range Rover was the SUV for Beverly Hills or Scarsdale, the one to be seen in. I mean you surely didn't want to have a Suburban or a Bronco in the driveway next to your Porsche, did you?
And this Lambo was just for the super rich, with it's V-12 and military type suspension. I understand, and I may be wrong, but most of these went to the Middle East. I've only ever seen one on the road here in New York.
So this wasn't such a bad idea, beating Acura, Lexus, Lincoln and Cadilac to the punch. But I think they only lasted a few years, until the mid 90's. If you do a web search, most of what you wil find are ads for used ones. I can't find much, but click the header for an enthusiast site, and below for a company(?) site.
http://www.automotive-technology.com/projects/laforza/

The AutoProphet weighs in on E85 and I was amused to see who commented on his post.

2006-02-27T10:07:00.001-05:00

I know, you're thinking enough with the Ethanol and Bio Fuel alread. But it's an interesting subject and one I feel that Ford has so many options available. But actually I was reading the AutoProphet's blog today, and it looks like we were both tapping the keyboards at the same time Sunday, about similar subjects, Ethanol!! So click on over and read what an industry insider and Engineer has to say on the subject. AutoProphet points to how this is an issue that has created unusal alliances, such as Environmentalists, Conservatives and Big Business. But one thing that really amused me was who the first commentor on the post was; Commentor over at AutoProphet

Sunday thoughts on E85 and fuel conservation in general in respect to Ford and it's partners.

2006-02-26T13:12:00.001-05:00

As usual for a Sunday, I was reading my car magazines (the few I still bother with) and watching my car shows, including Autoline Detroit on Speed channel. And this morning John McElroy had an interesting discusion with two execs from GM about their new marketing push on E85. The thrust of it, was that GM is pushing awareness of it's vehicles' ability to run on the E85 bio fuel blend, and discussed Brazil's success with their shift to the bio fuel blends. The commentators acknowledged that all of the domestic auto makers have been making Flex Fuel vehicles for years, with little fan fair. I've commented on it before, that many Fords over the years including some trucks have been flex fuel capable. And I've read over the last few months how Ford and now GM are working with suppliers to slowly create the infrastructure for the Ethanol blends. I know it's only a drop in the bucket now, but it's a start. So that got me thinking about Ford's partners and overseas operations.
In Europe Diesels are the biggest thrust by companies looking to improve the fuel efficiency of their vehicles and Ford and their partners have a very good range of engines and share technologies fairly well. So are Ford and partner vehicles in Europe also Flex Fuel capable? The Petrol V6 engines in many Ford and partner vehicles share DNA, so it shouldn't be overly expensive to make the switch if they aren't. What about the smaller engines? The already fuel efficient petrol I4 engines? And finally how about the big V8 and V12 engines from Jaguar and Aston Martin? Well they also share DNA with the lowly corporate 3.0 DOHC V6, so it theoretically should be easy to make the adjustments. Which from everything I've read on Ethanol, consist mainly of a sensor in the fuel system to read the fuel mixture and adjust programming for efficient combustion and probably a new fuel tank and lines. Ethanoll actually burns cleaner and has an octane advantage over Petrol, so it shouldn't affect performance even on these high priced models.
Now Australia may be a different story, but not really a problem. The Australian Ford powerplants are variations of the 4.0 I6 that is not shared with Europe or North America, and home grown versions of the Modular V8 seen in North America and select other markets globally. But again, if it's just a matter of a few hundred dollars per car to modify, and consisting of partial upgrade to fuel system and programming, it doesn't sound too dificult. I know Diesels are sold in Australia, but wonder what the market mix is between Petrol and Diesel? Also what is the Hybrid situation? Can someone from down under enlighten me? Ben ??
What about Mazda? The V6s Mazda use are also developments of the Ford 3.0, so the same modifications should be an easy move for them. And in the US market at least, E85 doesn't seem to be in the game plan for most Japanese marques. It could be a good marketing move for Mazda to make the switch and beat the other Japanese companies to the punch. Mazda doesn't seem to be whole heartedly onboard with Hybrid Electrics either, other than the Tribute which is going to be shut down soon. I've read that in Japan they are working on Hydrogen technologies, as everyone world wide seems to be, but what will their "Eco" card be? Could it be further development of the Turbo Direct Injection technology that we see in the MazdaSpeed6, and upcoming CX7 and MazdaSpeed3? Applying that technology to smaller displacement engines would allow a 1 liter engine to make the power a 2 liter engine traditionally makes, while still achieving greater gas milage, or so I've been told/read. Will Mazda blaze it's own path or jump on the E85 bandwagon, even just for the short term. I don't see how it could hurt.
And for all those that fear the loss of performance, DON'T, it should be right on par with what you have experienced from Gasoline only, maybe even slightly better. The Mustang's 4.0 SOHC V6, that it shares with the Ranger, also shares DNA with the 3.0 V6 (from the Ranger), and since the modifications are confined to fuel system and programming, should easily transfer.

Don't get me wrong, it's not as if I own stock in an Ethanol company, and I don't think E85 or Bio Diesel blends will be the magic cure. But they should be easy transitions, with major payoffs for the environement, economy and national security. It seems like such a win win situation.

(updates in red, to clarify which 3.0 V6) Both the Taurus and Ranger were offered as Flex Fuel vehicles, both with 3.0L V6 engines, but no means the same. The Ranger was the Cologne family V6.

Jalopnik points to Emunds blog on Free Trade

2006-02-24T13:58:00.000-05:00

Today on Jalopnik, they point to an Edmunds.com blog post about Free Trade and the "Chicken Tax." Basically that's the 25% tarrif the US charges for all imported "light" trucks. Many people see this as proectionism. But while all of these sites talk about our tarrif on imported trucks, how many of them discuss the tarrifs on US products exported into foreign ports? This seems like a reapeat of yesterday, so check out my post from yesterday;
Free Trade vs Fair Trade

It's easy for people to call this tarrif wrong and say it's protectionism, but do they realize what US products face overseas? So keep the "Chicken Tax" and damn Free Trade, let's have some Fair Trade!

What does Ford get, what do I get from Racing?

2006-02-24T12:15:00.000-05:00

Ford like many companies, has a strong pressence in motor sports. Spending huge amounts of money in sponsorship and development. But does Ford get it's bang for the buck? More importantly do I as a customer, benefit from the money Ford spends in various forms of motor sports each year?
It's historical fact that without racing there would be no Ford Motor Company. After all it was Henry Ford's sucess in 1902 that allowed him to raise the financing to start his third and sucessful attempt at an automobile manufacturing company.
Ford has been involved in racing either directly or indirectly ever since. In the ealry days, Stock Cars were "stock" cars, modified for racing, but based on production models. That's where the old saying "Win on Sunday, sell on Monday!" comes from. And Ford's endurance and quality was shown under the most abusive conditions.
It wasn't just in the United States that Ford raced, even in Australia, Europe, Africa, Asia and South America Ford powered cars ran in various "Stock Car" classes and rallies.
Not just the big V8 Fords either, in Europe and elsewhere, even the littlest Fords were burning up the tracks. This late 70's Ford Fiesta racing in Spain illustrates that fact.
And in many cases Ford was able to highlight developments in production models and bring that racing back to the people. Ford's relationship with companies like Cosworth and Lotus over the years led to improvements we see under our hoods today.
Even in open wheel classes, where you would think the least would translate to production models. This early 60's Ford Cosworth powered Lotus race car, helped develop overhead cam technology that is under Ford hoods today.
There are still racing series all over the world that are closer to "stock" than you would think, like the Australian Supercar Series. V8 Ford and Holden (GM) run head to head, and you can buy similar cars on dealer lots.
Even in the US there are still areas where you can see "door slammers" running around the tracks, and not just go fast turn left, these Trans Am Mustangs have to turn right and left and weave through a tough field of world class competitors that cost much more. These Mustangs can be considered rolling development labs also, as they run modified Modular V8s not so removed from what you can buy in dealerships.
Rally racing brings development in braking systems, fuel management systems, suspensions and proves them under extreme situations. The way racing is supposed to.

But what do these two have in common, what benefit as a customer do I get from a plastic body that hardly resembles the production car and rides on a complete tube chassis. The NASCAR Fusion is a "2 door" although they don't actually have doors, while the production model is only a 4 door. The racer is rear wheel drive, while production is front wheel drive. The racer has a 5.8L overhead valve V8, that hasn't been seen in a production model car or truck in a decade. That huge fosil of a V8 has a carburetor, which nobody has used on a production car in almost 20 years. So where is the development that usually accompanies racing? Can you buy a car like the one that races?

I'm not so ignorant to think that Ford doesn't get some benefit from NASCAR, but other than advertising and "brand recognition" where's the beef? I say NASCAR lost it's relevance in the early 80's, even as I recognize it's the hottest ticket in town. But I remember when I would watch Donnie Allison or David Pearson race their Ford Stock Cars, and they looked like cars I knew. The last NASCAR Stock Car I could recognize as a Ford, was the mid 80's T-Bird. I would prefer to see more Trans Am and SCCA racing or even an American racing series like they have in the UK, Germany and Australia, Grand Touring type racing. No carbs with restrictor plates, but real racing with real development.

There's nothing STOCK in stock car racing today, and that sucks.

TGIF, cause that means it's time for Carnival of Cars over at Mark Tapscott's page

2006-02-24T11:28:00.000-05:00

Mark Tapscott of Behind the Wheel, does a weekly round up of the best of auomotive blogs, called the Carnival of Cars. I had heard of it, but started checking it out a few weeks ago. Now it's one of my reasons for loving Fridays, the other being Saturdays.

Click on over and see Mark's rundown on the best auto posts. I've been lucky enough to be featured a couple of times, I haven't even looked yet, but it's always an honor to be considered.

Love the smell of burning rubber! Aussie site gallery of Fords burning their hides

2006-02-24T08:39:00.000-05:00

Just as Robert Duval's character in Apocolypse Now, loves the smell of Napalm in the morning, I love the smell of burning tire rubber. And last night while researching photos for a post, I found this gallery of Fords doing burnouts on an Australian auto enthiasts site. You may not recognize all of the cars, but they should have the familiar Blue Oval on them and they are burning those hides with style, so enjoy.

South African review of Focus ST, great read

2006-02-24T08:35:00.000-05:00

A very cool review of the Ford Focus ST, you know the one we'll never get. Let's you know why car enthusiasts everywhere want one.

Reader submitted link to MotorTrend rumor on Crown Victoria

2006-02-23T14:04:00.000-05:00

An Anonymous reader, left this link in a comment (that was not allowed, because it was Anonymous) and it's from MotorTrend, concerning a rumor that the Ford Crown Victoria will be replaced in 2008 by the redesigned Australian Ford Falcon. I hope and pray that this rumor has merrit, but I've got no confidence in MotorTrend magazine, especially their "FutureForecast" section. It's a one line entry and I've noticed it before. I think they just throw them up there and don't update them.
The Panther platform, which underpins the Crown Victoria/Grand Marquis/Town Car, has been around since 1979 with only minor changes. It's also been under fire in the press, because of some tragic fires involving Police Cruisers that have been hit by high speed cars. Sales have slumped also for these triplets, because they have not been updated in years. I had a 1992 Crown Victoria, and it was one of my favorite cars ever. With the 4.6 modular V8 and 4spd overdrive auto trans I acheived 25 mpg on the highway and about 15 mpg in a suburban loop, beating my V6 Ranger's 13/20 mpg. But in today's market you don't let your flagship models just stagnate.
I've said too many times to count that a new Panther replacement based on the Australian Falcon/Fairmont/LTD would be the answer, with it's IRS giving it modern road manners.
But I just don't have the faith in MotorTrend. Now if MPH had this rumor on their site, that would be something. Dave keeps on top of his site, and updates it daily, so I have a better feeling about the information I get over there. It doesn't hurt that Dave's one hell of car guy.

So, just a reminder, Anonymous posts will not be posted. I've made some allowances recently, but that's not the trend. Just sign off any comment with initials or a nickname, no need to register.

Links links, who's got the liinks?

2006-02-23T13:44:00.000-05:00

I was checking the sites on my link list to the left, and on GarageGuy's site I found a couple of interesting links. Maybe I'll add them to the sidebar, let me know what you think?

Gear6 Is a Auto News website. I gave them a quick look and like what I see. It all seems to be original content, I'll track it for a few days and make sure.

MotorKen Is a site I found over at Gear 6, it seems to be a reader submission site, and allows people to rate stories posted there. I will track this one, to make sure it's not a Splog of a different color. But let me know what you think.

I'm thinking of removing some links from the sidebar, sites that had originally exchanged links with me, but seem to have removed my site from their links, or sites that seem to have shut down, no activity for several weeks or months.

Peter DeLorenzo let's fire with both barrels on "Free/Fair Trade"

2006-02-23T09:25:00.000-05:00

I was reading Jalopnik this morning, and they point to an article by Peter DeLorenzo of the AutoExtermist where he let's loose on the inequity of Free Trade agreements. I think we'd all like to think of our world as a fair place, but it's not. The United States is basically an open market for anyone who wants to sell products. And with the load of new trade agreements over the last few years, you would assume that trade is "free" and "fair", but you would be very wrong.
Mr DeLorenzo isn't asking for protectionism, just a fair playing field. Nobody wants the government to "bail out" Ford or GM, but our trade policies put our own manufacturers at a great disadvantage. It's almost impossible for US manufacturers to sell their goods (not just cars) in many foreign markets because of their "protectionist" policies and high tarrifs on US goods.
I know many are going to say, that US manufacturers are saddled with high "legacy" costs, because of unwise negotiaions with the unions. And that American vehicles don't sell in these other markets because they aren't as good and are too big and clumsy compared with foreign products. But that's not entirely true and not the full picture. In many European countries healthcare is government paid. In other parts of the world, things like benefits and pensions are unknown words. And American quality is recognized as being on par with any other country on the planet and superior to some.
US companies doing business with China have to partner up with a local company in order to do business there, and they bear the bulk of investment in these risky ventures. We import far more Chinese goods than we export to China. Japan fairs no better. To buy a Ford Mustang in Japan it would cost you as much as a loaded Mercedes, after you factor in tarrifs and other charges. The same would be said for a Ford Focus, even though it shares the same platform as the Mazda3. It's not a level playing field for US products overseas, and our policies make it too easy for anyone to sell in the US.
It's not just trade policies that keep US products scarce in Japan, it's national pride. Why do Japanese cars not sweep the European market? Because Europeans realize what Americans don't, if you import everything, you export all your jobs. Manufacturing jobs have always been the step up the economic ladder for Americans, and if you take that away you doom many generations to poverty. Let's also remember that many countries like Japan and China manipulate their currency to keep that trade imbalance in place.

Read Jalopnik's post and then my past post on this subject here;

Jalopnik post on this

My July post on trade

I don't claim to know the answers, but found these two articles interesting.

Fiesta based Bronco for under $10k ??

2006-02-23T08:51:00.000-05:00

AutoBlog writes today, that Ford may build the Bronco concept on the Fiesta platform in Mexico. It's going to be the current Fiesta platform, not the upcomming new platform, again to save money, like the Focus. According to AutoBlog Ford wants to be able to sell it for under $10,000.
The original Bronco, which the concept take quite a few cues from in it's retro design, was built from 1966-1977. Standard engine was an inline 6 and optional was a small V8. I always wanted one of these, but surviving examples aren't cheap or are in baskets in someone's garage.
Toyota is also reaching into the retro closet with it's new FJ Cruiser concept, but it's been taking steroids with the chassis being the new Tacoma and having the 4.0 V6 as it's only engine.
The AutoBlog article says that the Bronco will be built in Mexico along with a 5 door Fiesta based B-segment hatch that will also come to the US (also on the outgoing Fiesta mechanicals.) This is of course a smart move on Ford's part, if it's not exactly what I had hoped for. Like the Fusion/Milan/Zephyr triplets, building them in Mexico keeps production costs down and allows them to say "North American built" on the window sticker. I love the idea of a plant making B-segment product for the US market, and the Fiesta platform is rock solid.
But here's a question, will the new Bronco really look like this? I mean the Ford EcoSport is on the same chassis and is a softroader like the Rav4/CRV/Element and Tuscon.
I would prefer that both came to market, the EcoSport as a higher volume unit and the Bronco as a niche model.
But I'm sceptical of the under $10k part. I know its important to fight the upcomming Chinese, but can you make a capable softroader and keep the price that low? Maybe a 5 door hatch, but not the Bronco. And if it's that cheap, will the quality be as shoddy as the Chinese?
Hyundai has enough problems keeping the price of their Accent low enough, they wouldn't consider trying to put the Tuscon out that low. Overall I'm happy that Ford is stepping up to the plate and not abandoning the bottom of the market.
But what powertrains will come to the US? I'm sure any all wheel drive will be optional like the Hondas and others, meaning that an all wheel drive version will be closer to $15k, and rightfully so.

But will it have the offroad ability that it's forebearer had?

I'll wait for more details to make my final decision, but I would have preferred to see a new flexible plant built in the US, and offering several models from the "New Fiesta" platform.

Two chalenges for Ford, that could easily be answered.

2006-02-22T20:04:00.000-05:00

The Net has been buzzing with pictures and specs of Dodge's Hornet concept for Geneva. The possability of Chrysler's Dodge division having an exciting entry into Europe's hotly contested B Segment, with it's 170 hp 1.6l turbo 4 cyl, and it's Honda Element style second set of doors, is exciting. But Ford already has competative models in this segment, the Fusion (UK) Fiesta and Ka. But does Ford have something to go head to head with the Hornet?
And challenge #2 for Ford is set to hit these shores relatively soon. The Toyota FJ Cruiser, retro off roader, based on Tacoma chassis and engines. To me it looks like the old FJ with a weight problem, but is supposed to be a capable off roader. It's going to have a big V6 pumping out about 240 hp and proven mechanicals. So it's going to be a tough act to follow. Can Ford hope to answer these challenges?
Maybe, if they do it right. The Bronco concept has been kicking around for a little while, I believe it actually predates the FJ on the auto show circuit. And rumors on the Net, were that this or the EcoSport may come to the US. The concept shown was powered by a 1.4l Diesel with Hybrid capability. And while that's Green and great for public relations, would it be competative against the FJ Cruiser and Jeep's venerable Wrangler? I think a better Diesel option would be the 2.5L that Ford markets globally in the Ranger. And for real off road ability, it can't be built on Fiesta mechanicals. A shortened version of the new 4Trac/Ranger concept with real 4 wheel drive would be necesary. All the more reason I don't think Ford will build it. But the styling is there in the concept, a ready made winner. But it will need real off road credentials to compete, something the EcoSport/Fiesta chassis can't give it.
But this is another story, a ready made winner for Europe or the US. The Ford Faction concept, looks better than the Hornet and could easilly fit right on that new Fiesta/Mazda2 chassis. And with a Direct Injection/Turbo 1.6l I4 (like the one I talked about for the Reflex) could probably match the Hornet's power.

What do you think? Am I wrong about the Bronco?

Algae as bio diesel?

2006-02-22T19:49:00.001-05:00

Skierpage, left a comment on my Bio Fuel post below, with a link to a Wikipedia article on Bio Diesel. What really interested me was the list of plants used and their yeild per acre. Amazingly algae was the highest yeild and according to the article, can be made at existing water sewage treatment plants.

Of course the biggest problems with Bio Diesel are water and gelling. Water can condense in storage tanks and Bio Diesel gels at a higher temp than petro Diesel. Both can be a problem in colder climates. But blending the two forms of fuel seems to solve that problem.

Read the article when you have a chance, it's amazing what the benefits of Bio Diesel are.

Why I do this, how it all began, a wandering post.

2006-02-22T10:24:00.000-05:00

Why do I do it, where did it all begin? I spend hours each day working on this blog. I don't get paid for it, despite the Google ads you see, it's not for any money. It's a love of cars, especially Ford cars.

As a young boy I had a huge amount of Matchbox, Hotwheels and Corgi cars. I would play for hours on the floor, usually with my brothers, but sometimes alone. I've always had a preferance for Ford cars, even as a child. Don't get me wrong, I had others too, like everyone, I had Masseratie and VW toys. But my favorites were always the Mustangs and Cougars.

I would spend my schooldays daydreaming, wishing I could design the next big hit car. Not unlike many boys my age, I'd be dreaming of chrome wheels and swoopy lines, while I was supposed to be learning about the Crusades or Algebra. Now looking back, if I had paid more attention to Algebra, maybe I would be in Dearborn.
All my books had doodles of cars, and even in high school, I would spend study hall figuring out what my dream car would look like, what powertrain it would have, and of course what would I call it. You may not believe this, I don't really care if you do, but my dream car was called the Puma. Funny that 10 years after I left school Ford did actually build a car called the Puma. Mine was going to be a range of cars also, with 4-6&8 cyl versions with front or all wheel drive. I can't draw a straight line or a circle, even after taking Studio Art in school, but I would endlessly draw and color my Pumas, as well as list specs under each drawing. I was shocked last year when I discovered that Ford built a Puma in Europe. But don't get me wrong, I have no delusions that someone stole my notebook from high school.

So now at almost 41 what do I do? I blog, and I collect Johnny Lightning diecast cars, as well as Matchbox and HotWheels. I don't work in the auto industry, the closest I came was when I was in college, and it was time for an Internship, I set up a program with the local Ford Motor Credit office and my school. I transferred to a different school before that was supposed to begin, so I never actually took part in it, but I know that for a while it did go on.

So there it is the story of one frustrated car designer, who still plays with toy cars. Well, actually I don't play with them anymore, you'd have to take them out of the package, and that would make my $1.77 find valueless, especially if I paid $6 at a swapmeet.

So if you read one of my posts on Splogs or whatever and wonder why I get upset that someone would do that, you can realize that I do this because I love to, not because I get paid. It's my way of doodling on cars, considering I can't draw. I strongly urge others to do the same, it's fun and it's free, and to misquote Mike Tyson; "It keeps me from killing Y'all!"

Have a great day

One more option in the fight against Splogs

2006-02-21T14:25:00.000-05:00

How do you stop bad behavior? Well, you use negative reinforcement, that's how. And in the continuing fight against Splog sites like OstAuto and TheAutomobilist, how can you fight nameless and faceless cowards that reap in benefits of other people's work? Well I guess the only way would be to remove the incentive for their offensive actions.

Now I and other bloggers have Google AdSense boxes on our sites, they are ads pure and simple, as is the Google Search bar at the top of my page. Google has a smart idea here, but most bloggers like myself will make pennies from these ads. But humps like these Sploggers can make a neat proffit every month by loading their pages with ads from Google and then setting up auto reposts of RSS feeds from other blogs like mine. Where I will be lucky to earn $5-10 a month, they can earn several hundred dollars a month, and in the case of Automobilist, who has several of these pages set up, even more.

But what the humps forget is, that Google has guidelines for the use and placement of their ads. Those guidelines, which I had to agree to, forbid competative ads on your page, and require original content. Even with the wiggle room allowed by "Fair Use" principals, these guys are in the wrong.

Maybe Google will remove their ads and their motivation to steal.

Never too much Reflex talk

2006-02-21T12:04:00.001-05:00

My new obsession from Ford is the Reflex concept, if you hadn't been able to figure that out. Ever since seeing pictures of this concept, I've been wanting one. Now I don't necessarily want the exact concept, I'm not too thrilled with the solar panels in the roof, and I'm kind of cool on the Diesel/Electric Hybrid powerplant. But the styling is dead on and the idea of a sporty 3 door hatch with 2 seats (forget the stupid 3rd seat) really gets me wanting one. I usually hate silver cars, too bland for my taste, but this looks good.
A few commentors have said that they would like to see something like this built on the MX5 chassis, with rear wheel drive and the 2.3L Direct Injected Turbo from MazdaSpeed. Well, that would be a pipedream in my view. I know you're supposed to dream big, but Ford doesn't need a reboddied and hot rodded MX5. Ford needs something that will have innovation written all over it and that can be a long term player. I see the Reflex as an entry level sporty coupe, not a mini Jaguar or Aston Martin. Keep it small and somewhat economical, aim it at the youth market. Make it somewhat practical too. So that means a usable hatch, options for ski or bike racks on the back and front wheel drive to get to those ski slopes as well as to work in the winter. An MX5 chassis, would leave this strictly as a seasonal second car, or the necessary traction and stability control would drive the price up too far.
Here's the way I see it, take some of the technology from the MazdaSpeed and apply it to a smaller engine, say a 1.6 L or at most a 2.0 L engine. Give it the direct injection and turbo, making around 175 hp, but keeping fuel economy above 35 mpg on the highway. If I could get 175 hp and over 40 mpg that would be the best. Front wheel drive, with a 5 or 6 speed manual available, a CVT automatic optional. Give me the option of a moonroof or even T-tops or Targa roof. 17 inch wheels will make more sense than those huge dubs, maybe even 16 inchers depending on production.

I know some are going to disagree, wanting more power or rear wheel drive. And others may disagree with the abandoning of the Diesel/Hybrid powertrain. But this is a package that I see as coming in at the mid $20k range and appealing to a wide range of people. I don't see it being a huge seller like a Mustang, so keeping it front wheel drive, allows it to be built off a new B segment Fiesta/Mazda2 platform in a flexible plant. Dreams are nice, but I want to see this car produced, and then buy one.

UAW Dos and Don'ts list of cars to buy

2006-02-21T10:18:00.000-05:00

A friend of mine who reads and comments on the site, pointed to a website where the UAW lists recomended vehicles to buy if you want to support American Union workers. And there were a couple of surprises.
I shouldn't have been surprised that the new Fusion, built in Mexico, doesn't appear on the list.
But imagine my surprise, that the Mazda6 is built in a US plant by UAW workers.

The one that really kicked my ass, and I'm going to have to appologize to several people I know, was the Toyota Tacoma!!!!!!!!!!

So I guess that if I buy a new 4 door sedan, it's going to be a Mazda 6. It satisfies on some level most of my buying requirements. It's built in the US, by Union Employees and by a FoMoCo partner/brand. Not only that it's a good quality car, that has nice styling, great quality and doesn't break the bank. So maybe I'll have to hang a blue oval on it myself? I can just hear my brother singing that anoying Zoom Zoom song the next time we're talking on the phone.

Isn't China still communist? Ford's chinese partner enters Racing??

2006-02-20T15:16:00.000-05:00

China is still a Communist country isn't it? I mean it's hard to tell anymore, what with their relationship with WalMart and the Mercedes dealers.
Do you think that Baldy here is spinning in his grave? I mean do you think he ever imagined this...
China has jumped into the 21st Century with both feet I guess. Big flashy auto shows, going from bicycles to automobiles in no time at all. All the foreign investment and partnerships.
I've mentioned before, that even Communist China has the new focus.
But I never knew or imagined that they have a professional racing series.
Or an FIA race track.
I mean, they are still Communist, right?

My confusion aside, click the link to read the article about Ford's Communist Chinese partner, entering into the Chinese Championship Racing Series in the 2.0 Liter class.

Absolutely unbelievable. How long ago was Tiananmen Square????

MPH rumors that Ranger gone after 2008!! WTF??

2006-02-20T13:39:00.001-05:00

Is the Ranger set to give up the ghost? Dave from MPH Magazine online, pointed out a new Rumor in their online content, and I had an Anonymous commentor over the weekend saying the same thing.
Compact trucks in the US have grown to midsize except the Ford Ranger/Mazda B series twins. The basic truck getting no more than cosmetic upgrades for about a decade. The Ranger that was for 15 or more years the best selling compact pickup in the US, is now declining in sales and growing stale.
Weeks ago, Ford press releases anounced the introduction of this compact pickup in Thailand. And I assumed that it would be the replacement for the Ranger (which it may be.) But if it is, it looks like it won't be built in the US, but instead in Thailand. Taking advantage of cheaper labor rates, and the new trade agreement with that country that will eliminate tarrifs on trucks imported from there.
Here are past posts on the subject;

New Ranger Concept

Free Trade Agreement with Thailand

I'm interested to see where this situation goes. If we get a new Ranger, will it be imported from Thailand? If so, will others follow the lead?

MyFordDreams is copyrighted material

2006-02-20T09:51:00.000-05:00

You know, I learn new things everyday. For instance, the fact that I'm typing away at this keyboard, and publishing my blog to the web, means that as soon as I hit the "Publish" button my work is considered "Copyrighted" Under US law. Thanks to Ben of OzCarBlog and JW Fisher, I've been able to learn a little more. Just as a precaution, I've amended the header of my blog, to indicate all material is copyrighted, and I've added to the sidebar the CreativeContributions registration.
Now what this means basically, that if someone like the Sploggers, reposts my materials in whole without acknowledging the source and asking for permission, they are violating copyright law.
But my CreativeContributions registration, does allow copying for "Non-Commercial" use. That means if someone like Jeff F, Ben K or any of the other bloggers who don't make a proffit from their blogs, wants to copy my material it's fine with me. But Sploggers like OstAuto or TheAutomobilist copy my material, they don't have permission. Now Automobilist has stopped harvesting my material, but OstAuto has not, hence my earlier "juvenile" and offensive post. That post was designed to offend the owners of Ost Auto, and hopefully get the message across that they shouldn't blatantly rip off my work.

I've heard and read about "Fair Use", but they don't seem to be even remotely within those guidelines, simply because they benefit monetarilly via the ads on their site. So the previous post will be removed soon, and I will not be posting on this matter again, unless provoked.

It's back to doing what I like best, talking about Ford and their vehicles.

"copyright in the United States automatically attaches upon the creation of an original work of authorship" Excerpt from Wikipedia article on copyright, linked in header.

First Brazil, now Sweden, when the US?

2006-02-19T19:16:00.001-05:00

Petrolium oil products and fuels have been in use for over one hundred years. The primary fuel for all motor vehicles. No news there, right? But is it the only fuel available? Is it the best? Where does it come from?
Well, most of it, comes from the Middle East, but not all. Middle easter oil is just the most "accesable" oil reserves in the world. There is also oil in North America, the North Atlantic, South America and the Gulf of Mexico. But a large portion of our oil comes from this vilotile armpit of the world, the sliver of land connecting Africa to Asia, once the birthplace of great cultures and religions, now a powder keg waiting for a spark. This area of the world which if you look at a map or globe, is not very large at all, keeps the rest of the world jumping through hoops, because of oil. Let's face it, if it wasn't for the oil, not many of us would give a damn about the place. But what are the alternatives? What would we do without Arab oil?
Bio Fuels, like Ethanol and BioDiesel that's what! It amazes me, that as far back as 1916 Henry Ford talked about Petrolium based fuels running out and proposed Ethanol as an alternative. Even saying it would be a way to improve the plight of US farmers, yet now it's 2006, 90 years later, and we're still sitting with our thumbs up our rears, wondering how to break our dependance on foreign oil.
A few weeks ago, I read that Brazil was passing legislation requiring that all vehicles sold there, be bio fuel capable. Realizing that unlike their neighbor Venezuela, they did not have petrolium, but do have the ability to grow crops capable of producing Ethanal based fuels. By the way, did you know that Venezuela and Mexico are members of OPEC? But back to the point, Brazil saw that they had a weekness and a possible way to decrease that while improving their own economy.
Now today, I read in AutoBlog, that Sweden, tiny little Sweden, has started along their own path to independance from oil. They plan to make the swithc to biol fuels by the year 2020. The Swedes are a technically proficient economy, but not a huge land mass. I wonder if they have the farm land to grow enough bio fuel?
So I wonder where that leaves the US? I mean, we're dependant on foreign oil, but we have vast tracts of land, and a massive agricultural base. I've always been told that we pay farmers not to grow certain crops, and paid subsidies for that. But on the other hand, we have situations where farmers over the last 20 years or more, have been loosing the family farm, because they've become so sensative to crop price fluctuations and overextended on loans. Couldn't we grow enough corn or soy beans to supply a substantial amount of bio fuels? Wouldn't one of the effects be the stabilization of our agricultural sector? If farmers are selling crops to be made into fuel, then wouldn't we save all the federal subsidies? I mean it sounds like a win win situation.
How about this, if we're growing more crops, that produce more oxygen, and burning bio fuels that release less polutants, aren't we also helping our ecology? Wow, another win win situation.
I know I'm oversimplifying this, nothing is that clear cut is it? I mean I keep on hearing how bio fuels are not as good as petrolium, but the funny thing is I also hear that they perform just as well. Who's right? I don't think it matters really. Because even if you got slightly worse milage from bio fuel, which every indicator does not support, we would still be fuel independant.

So I'm glad that GW Bush supports bio fuels, I'm thrilled that Willie Nelson supports bio fuels, I love the fact that GM is doing a media blitz on their E85 vehicles and Bill Ford is blazing the "Way Forward" by "Driving American Inovation," but what is that really getting us? I mean Ford has been selling "Flex Fuel" vehicles for years, I've known people who drove them, even if they didn't realize their vehicles were flex fuel, but what good is that if you can't find the fuel?

Will it be another 90 years before we can fill our tanks without supporting terrorist or being held fiscal hostage by fascists in robes, who are calling us the "Great Satan" on one hand, while spending our money with the other? What we need now is an infrastructure to make and distribute bio fuels, and possibly legislation demanding that all vehicles sold from now on are capable of running on said fuels.

More Wagon talk, follow up from Yesterday.

2006-02-19T16:22:00.000-05:00

Rerember when station wagons were all over the landscape? After the rise of the SUV, they started to dwindle, as Baby Boomers wanted to escape the "un-cool" wagons that they grew up in. Well, some of us, admittedly probably few of us, love wagons. The ride and practicality of a sedan with the extra cargo and people moving ability. SUVs and now Crossovers will fill that need very well in the midsize and larger segment. But some people don't want one of those, and the higher prices, the extra abilities like all wheel drive command.
So as a continuation of yesterday's post on the Malibu Maxx, and what competes with it. Inspired by my friends search for a utilitarian vehicle at the lower end of the price spectrum, here I am again. Talking about wagons. The Maxx is not realy a wagon, but a 5 door hatch "psuedo" wagon. And I've already discussed the Mazda6 twins, 5 door and Sport Wagon.
But somehow, I forgot to mention the Dodge Magnum as an option. Probably, because like many people, when I think of the Magnum, I think of the firebreathing Hemi version. But in reality, there are 2 V-6 models. The 190 hp Base model and the 250 hp SXT. Now, the Base prices out in the neighborhood of the others, and I'm sure the SXT isn't too far away. And they have the added novelty, some would say disadvantage, of being rear wheel drive. But with the traction and stability control, you'll get through most bad weather. Even with front wheel drive, the Maxx and Mazda6 twins are not infalable.
I've mentioned making a Mercury Milan version of the Mazda6 Sport Wagon recently.
But I've also spoken adnausium about bringing the Ford Falcon to these shores. It's rear wheel drive, fully independent suspension, and I6 & V8 powertrains would make perfect matches for the Dodge's Mercedes sourced platform. But probably could not be decontented enough to be a direct price competitor.

I know everyone is counting on Crossovers to fill the gap between the SUVs and Sedans, but isn't there room for wagons? Chrysler seems to think so. Wagons never really disapeared from the market, obviously Volvo, Mercedes, BMW and Audi still make wagons, but they've dispeared from the middle and low end of the price segment. Even small wagons are disapearing, the Mada Protoge' wagon, was not replaced, instead the Mazda3 5 door fills that slot. Chevy did not bring a Cobalt wagon over to replace the Cavalier wagon, Toyota has the Matrix and it's Pontiac Vibe twin, but Honda didn't bring a new Accord wagon over, and Nissan hasn't sold a wagon since the Maxima's early days.

I'd like to see a new Ford/Mercury wagon, with a "heritage" name like Country Squire, Ranch Sedan, or Colony Park. Maybe the Baby Boomers will get nostaligic for them?

Ranger? 4Trac Concept from Thailand, what does the future hold.

2006-02-18T19:43:00.001-05:00

I think the last time I posted on this, I assumed it was the global replacement for the Ranger, but after re-reading the press release I realized it never actually said that. Now I'm sure that if it makes production it will replace the Ranger and Mazda B series around the world. But does that mean it will not come to the US? I think it would be a great replacement for the Ranger here. I know that if the Ranger had the 2.5L Diesel here in the US, it could blaze new trails in the US market. Great fuel economy, and extra low end grunt for off road ability. The 4Trac concept shows nice styling, even if some of the fluff doesn't make it to production, like the bedside storage compartments and multi element tailgate.

What do you think?

Here's another idea for Mercury, based on a phone call from a friend

2006-02-18T19:17:00.000-05:00

Some good friends of mine called today, they were out car shopping. They had just shopped the Malibu Maxx hatch/wagon from Chevrolet, and wanted to know what would compare favorably to it. Now in this price range, the low $20k's there's not much to compare to the flexability of the Maxx. With it's much improved 3.5L V-6, sliding rear seat, large hatch opening and low price, the Chevy seems to be without much head to head competition.
Sure the Mazda6 has a 5 door liftback, and is available with the 221 hp V6, but what else is out there? I thought of Honda, Toyota and Nissan, but they have no 5 doors or wagons in this size. The VW Jetta wagon, is no longer I believe, and none of the other Europeans can compete in this price range. Subarus, would be a natural choice with the Legacy, right? No their prices run several thousand dollars higher.
Really, the Mazda6 liftback and Sport Wagon are the only two within the price range and size, that aren't a mini ute. Even our friends from Korea don't offer wagons, depending on the mini suvs, like the Sante Fe and Tuscon. So your only choices are the Mazda twins and the Malibu Maxx.
So here's another oportunity for Mercury. Since Ford dealers have the FreeStyle, and soon the Edge, but Mercury will have neither, why not give the Milan either a 5 door or wagon version? Or better yet, both. Admitedly this segment is not a huge one, but why let Chevy and Mazda have it all to themselves ? If the "Way Forward" is supposed to "Inovative," why not take the chance, especially with the lower volume brand? If it fails, which it won't, you only slightly compromise a model, that is a wallflower. If it hits big, you invigorate a brand that suffers now anyway. It's a gamble, but it's not a disaster waiting to happen.

Hey, here's a question. If Ford uses any of my ideas, can I ask for a percentage? Or do you think they have a few brain cells still working around Dearborn, and may come to this conclusion on their own?

Go Bob go!! Farago on Ford over at TTC

2006-02-18T14:05:00.000-05:00

Again Robert Farago, over at TheTruthAboutCars website, talks about the situaiton at Ford and the demise of the GT. At least it's not a "Deathwatch" and I agree with much of what he says.
Rightfully so, he says that the GT Supercar was not the correct fit for Ford. I partially agree, although I loved seeing it make it to production, it was never meant to be permanent, and it did little toward the bottom line. I'm happy to see that Mr Farago likes the Reflex, but was surprised that he supported the Diesel/Hybrid powertrain. I can see his point, but still think that if it makes production, a petrol 1.4 motor is more likely. But if it could have a Diesel/Hybrid and a manual transmission, I may consider it. It would give Ford major bragging rights with it's 65 mpg.

Click on over and read what he has to say, some of it will be familiar, as I've said it. But I'm not delusional to believe he reads my blog, it's just a matter of great minds think alike. Now you'll have to excuse me, I have to let some of the hot air out of my swollen cranium.

Some ideas for Lincoln and Mercury, involving of course the Aussie Fords.

2006-02-18T11:07:00.000-05:00

Take the Australian Ford Falcon/Fairmont, with it's petrol I-6 and V-8 engines, fully independant suspension, rear wheel drive and handsome styling. Bring the design to North America, add the 2.7L Diesel V-6 into the options sheet, use the longer wheelbase Fairmont as a new Lincoln, and the shorter Falcon as a new Mercury. The higher prices these brands could sell for, and the uniquness from other North American Fords would solve the problems.
Ford would have a medium volume rear wheel drive offering, with varying powertrain options, that could compete with eveything from the Chrysler 300/Dodge Charger right up to Mercedes and BMW. The I-6 would be limited to the Mercury brand, and the Diesel would be optional to both. The top of the line V-8 could be a Supercharged 5.4L V-8, while the base V-8 in Lincolns and optional in Mercury could be the Mustang's 4.6L V-8 with 300 hp. Make all of the engines BioFuel capable, either E-85/Ethanol or Bio Diesel. Six or seven speed Automatic transmission, or even a CVT would be standard, with a manual considered only for an SVT version of the Mercury. Traction and stability control should be standard on Mercury and Lincoln.

If volume is needed, give Ford a decontented version, with styling from the 427/Fusion, and offer only the V-8 from the Mustang or a V-6 from the Mustang/Ranger. Keep the Mercury differentiated from the Lincoln and Ford, with it's exclusive offering of the I6 and styling that does not too closely mimic either sibling, while still being interesting.

The Lincoln version should have styling from the Continental concept and even offer the rear suicide doors, maybe even a 4 door convertible, outsourced to ASC, like their Helios concept based on the Chrysler 300 and pay homage to the 60's Lincoln.

As for any "Ute" version, that should be only a Mercury, not a Lincoln or Ford. Ford division is top heavy with trucks, and may introduce more, but not this one. Lincoln, already has the Mark X, Mark LT and Navigator, they don't need another pickup. Besides, the exclusive Mercury Ute will give that brand a lift in image. There should be no stripped version, just performance oriented highly optioned versions. Give it a real name, one from Mercury's past like Turnpike Cruiser or Marauder X100, the later possibly tying in with a sedan performance version. Don't make it a western or cowboy name.

If things work with Mercury, bring the Territory over as a Mercury exclusive, include a Hybrid version of the crossover, but not the sedan or ute. Maybe a turbo I6, but only a 4.6 V-8 in this one, no 5.4 in the Territory. Re-use the Mountaineer name on this, killing the Explorer twin, and negating the need for a crossover version of the FreeStyle or Edge.

Sounds like a pipe dream huh? Well, I'll keep on dreaming until Ford starts building interesting.

Spanish language blog about Ford EcoSport

2006-02-17T21:42:00.000-05:00

Here's something interesting, a Spanish language blog here on Blogger, about the Ford EcoSport. Now even with a couple of years of high school then college Spanish, I can't make out all of it, but what I can make out is this;

The owner of this blog, after being frustrated finding information about the EcoSport, posted very useful information about the vehicle in Spanish for others to compare. Now, I've noticed that I get visitors from Spanish speaking countries, that find me on Google or Yahoo searches, and only stay a few seconds, possibly because they don't speak English. So I hope that this helps them, and the author of this blog.

Consider it my "community service" for the day. If anyone is fluent in both languages, let me know what you think of his site.